Literature DB >> 15700317

Evaluation of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test with automated reading in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average-risk population.

Guy D Launoy1, Hughes J Bertrand, Celia Berchi, Vincent Y Talbourdet, Anne Valérie N Guizard, Véronique M Bouvier, Emile R Caces.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer screening is a high public health priority in all industrialized countries. However, the low sensitivity of the common guaiac screening test (HemoccultII) makes practitioners and public health decision makers reluctant to set up a national screening program. In recent years, immunochemical tests based on the use of a specific antibody have been found to be more sensitive than the HemoccultII test. However, for screening purposes, any gain in sensitivity is of interest only if specificity and positive predictive value are satisfactory. Our aim was to assess the performance of an immunochemical test with an automated reading technique (Magstream 1000) for different hemoglobin content cut-off points. The study was carried out in the general population aged 50-74 years in the geographic area of Cotentin (Normandy, France). From 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2002, 7,421 one-time screening tests (Magstream) were administered by general practitioners and occupational physicians to patients at the end of regular consultations. Colonoscopy was proposed to the 434 people with a positive test. All cancers occurring in the study population between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2003 were collected by general practitioners, gastroenterologists and the local registry. At the usual positivity threshold (20 ng hemoglobin/ml), screening sensitivity and specificity at 2 years of follow-up with 95% CIs were, respectively, 0.85 (0.72-0.98) and 0.94 (0.94-0.95). If the hemoglobin content cut-off point had been set at 50 ng/ml instead of the usual cut-off, positivity would have been 3.1% and positive predictive value for a cancer or a large adenoma would have been 0.49, with sensitivity of 0.68-0.83 and specificity of 0.97. Our results suggest that use of an immunochemical test with an automated reading technique could improve the prospects for mass-screening for colorectal cancer since it offers a promising alternative to guaiac tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15700317     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  20 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Preliminary Screening Methods for Colorectal Cancer in a Mass Program.

Authors:  Ding Ye; Qiuchi Huang; Qilong Li; Xiyi Jiang; Mayila Mamat; Mengling Tang; Jianbing Wang; Kun Chen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Accuracy of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Elizabeth G Liles; Stephen Bent; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Test performance of faecal occult blood testing for the detection of bowel cancer in people with chronic kidney disease (DETECT) protocol.

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Kirsten Howard; Jeremy R Chapman; Allison Tong; Michael J Bourke; Andrew Hayen; Petra Macaskill; Richard L Hope; Narelle Williams; Anh Kieu; Richard Allen; Steven Chadban; Carol Pollock; Angela Webster; Simon D Roger; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Comparison of a guaiac based and an immunochemical faecal occult blood test in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average risk population.

Authors:  L Guittet; V Bouvier; N Mariotte; J P Vallee; D Arsène; S Boutreux; J Tichet; G Launoy
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  A comparative case study of bowel cancer screening in the UK and Australia: evidence lost in translation?

Authors:  K L Flitcroft; D J B St John; K Howard; S M Carter; M P Pignone; G P Salkeld; L J Trevena
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Evaluation of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jeanette M Daly; Camden P Bay; Barcey T Levy
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2013-05-12

Review 7.  Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; Jeffrey K Lee; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Advances in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Hongha T Vu; Carol A Burke
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-10

9.  Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Emma H Levine; Cecilia Doan; Anton Gies; Hermann Brenner; Charles Quesenberry; Jeffrey K Lee; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Colorectal cancer screening: why immunochemical fecal occult blood tests may be the best option.

Authors:  Kathy L Flitcroft; Les M Irwig; Stacy M Carter; Glenn P Salkeld; James A Gillespie
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.