Literature DB >> 15700161

Direct optical sensors: principles and selected applications.

Guenter Gauglitz1.   

Abstract

In the field of bio and chemosensors a large number of detection principles has been published within the last decade. These detection principles are based either on the observation of fluorescence-labelled systems or on direct optical detection in the heterogeneous phase. Direct optical detection can be measured by remission (absorption of reflected radiation, opt(r)odes), by measuring micro-refractivity, or measuring interference. In the last case either Mach-Zehnder interferometers or measurement of changes in the physical thickness of the layer (measuring micro-reflectivity) caused, e.g., by swelling effects in polymers (due to interaction with analytes) or in bioassays (due to affinity reactions) also play an important role. Here, an overview of methods of microrefractometric and microreflectometric principles is given and benefits and drawbacks of the various approaches are demonstrated using samples from the chemo and biosensor field. The quality of sensors does not just depend on transduction principles but on the total sensor system defined by this transduction, the sensitive layer, data acquisition electronics, and evaluation software. The intention of this article is, therefore, to demonstrate the essentials of the interaction of these parts within the system, and the focus is on optical sensing using planar transducers, because fibre optical sensors have been reviewed in this journal only recently. Lack of selectivity of chemosensors can be compensated either by the use of sensor arrays or by evaluating time-resolved measurements of analyte/sensitive layer interaction. In both cases chemometrics enables the quantification of analyte mixtures. These data-processing methods have also been successfully applied to antibody/antigen interactions even using cross-reactive antibodies. Because miniaturisation and parallelisation are essential approaches in recent years, some aspects and current trends, especially for bio-applications, will be discussed. Miniaturisation is especially well covered in the literature.

Year:  2004        PMID: 15700161     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-004-2895-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  18 in total

Review 1.  Interferometric methods for label-free molecular interaction studies.

Authors:  Amanda Kussrow; Carolyn S Enders; Darryl J Bornhop
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Porous SiO2 interferometric biosensor for quantitative determination of protein interactions: binding of protein A to immunoglobulins derived from different species.

Authors:  Michael P Schwartz; Sara D Alvarez; Michael J Sailor
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Invited Review Article: Review of centrifugal microfluidic and bio-optical disks.

Authors:  David D Nolte
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.523

4.  A nanoporous interferometric micro-sensor for biomedical detection of volatile sulphur compounds.

Authors:  Tushar Kumeria; Luke Parkinson; Dusan Losic
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.703

Review 5.  Perspective on optical biosensors and integrated sensor systems.

Authors:  Frances S Ligler
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  A planar waveguide optical sensor employing simple light coupling.

Authors:  Torsten Mayr; Tobias Abel; Barbara Enko; Sergey Borisov; Christian Konrad; Stefan Köstler; Bernhard Lamprecht; Stefan Sax; Emil J W List; Ingo Klimant
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 4.616

7.  Mass-transport limitations in spot-based microarrays.

Authors:  Ming Zhao; Xuefeng Wang; David Nolte
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Highly sensitive detection of naphthalene in solvent vapor using a functionalized PBG refractive index sensor.

Authors:  Maiko Girschikofsky; Manuel Rosenberger; Stefan Belle; Malte Brutschy; Siegfried R Waldvogel; Ralf Hellmann
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Controlling interferometric properties of nanoporous anodic aluminium oxide.

Authors:  Tushar Kumeria; Dusan Losic
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.703

10.  Label-free electrical quantification of the dielectrophoretic response of DNA.

Authors:  Anja Henning; Jörg Henkel; Frank F Bier; Ralph Hölzel
Journal:  PMC Biophys       Date:  2008-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.