Literature DB >> 15699833

Incidence and prognosis of intraabdominal hypertension in a mixed population of critically ill patients: a multiple-center epidemiological study.

Manu L N G Malbrain1, Davide Chiumello, Paolo Pelosi, David Bihari, Richard Innes, V Marco Ranieri, Monica Del Turco, Alexander Wilmer, Nicola Brienza, Vincenzo Malcangi, Jonathan Cohen, Andre Japiassu, Bart L De Keulenaer, Ronny Daelemans, Luc Jacquet, Pierre-François Laterre, Günther Frank, Paulo de Souza, Bruno Cesana, Luciano Gattinoni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intraabdominal hypertension is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in surgical and trauma patients. The aim of this study was to assess, in a mixed population of critically ill patients, whether intraabdominal pressure at admission was an independent predictor for mortality and to evaluate the effects of intraabdominal hypertension on organ functions.
DESIGN: Multiple-center, prospective epidemiologic study.
SETTING: Fourteen intensive care units in six countries. PATIENTS: A total of 265 consecutive patients admitted for >24 hrs during the 4-wk study period.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intraabdominal pressure was measured twice daily via the bladder. Data recorded on admission were the patient demographics with Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and type of admission; during intensive care stay, Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment score and intraabdominal pressure were measured daily together with fluid balance. Nonsurvivors had a significantly higher mean intraabdominal pressure on admission than survivors: 11.4 +/- 4.8 vs. 9.5 +/- 4.8 mm Hg. Independent predictors for mortality were age (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.06; p = .003), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.15; p < .0001), type of intensive care unit admission (odds ratio, 2.5 medical vs. surgical; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-5.16; p = .01), and the presence of liver dysfunction (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.8; p = .04). The occurrence of intraabdominal hypertension during the intensive care unit stay was also an independent predictor of mortality (relative risk, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-3.06; p = .01). Patients with intraabdominal hypertension at admission had significantly higher Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment scores during the intensive care unit stay than patients without intraabdominal hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraabdominal hypertension on admission was associated with severe organ dysfunction during the intensive care unit stay. The mean intraabdominal pressure on admission was not an independent risk factor for mortality; however, the occurrence of intraabdominal hypertension during the intensive care unit stay was an independent outcome predictor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15699833     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000153408.09806.1b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  175 in total

1.  Beneficial effects of theophylline infusions in surgical patients with intra-abdominal hypertension.

Authors:  Zsolt Bodnár; Zoltán Szentkereszty; Zoltán Hajdu; Gilbert A Boissonneault; Sándor Sipka
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure and decompressive laparotomy on aerated lung volume distribution.

Authors:  Jian-cang Zhou; Qiu-ping Xu; Kong-han Pan; Chen Mao; Chong-wu Jin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Measurement of compartment pressure of the rectus sheath during intra-abdominal hypertension in rats.

Authors:  Christoph Meier; René Schramm; Joerg H Holstein; Burkhardt Seifert; Otmar Trentz; Michael D Menger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Management of peritonitis in the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Carlos A Ordoñez; Juan Carlos Puyana
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Intravesicular pressure monitoring does not cause urinary tract infection.

Authors:  Michael L Cheatham; Scott G Sagraves; Jeffery L Johnson; Mark W White
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  [New approaches to intensive care for sepsis].

Authors:  G Marx; T Schuerholz; K Reinhart
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  [Abdominal compartment syndrome: significance, diagnosis and treatment].

Authors:  A Schachtrupp; M Jansen; P Bertram; R Kuhlen; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 8.  Fluid management for the prevention and attenuation of acute kidney injury.

Authors:  John R Prowle; Christopher J Kirwan; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 28.314

9.  Normotensive ischemic acute kidney injury as a manifestation of intra-abdominal hypertension.

Authors:  Vijaykumar Lingegowda; A Ahsan Ejaz; Puneet Sood
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 10.  Current insights in intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: open the abdomen and keep it open!

Authors:  Inneke E De Laet; Mariska Ravyts; Wesley Vidts; Jody Valk; Jan J De Waele; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.