Literature DB >> 15699482

Randomized trial of two intravenous schedules of the topoisomerase I inhibitor liposomal lurtotecan in women with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer: a trial of the national cancer institute of Canada clinical trials group.

Graham G Dark1, A Hilary Calvert, Robert Grimshaw, Christopher Poole, Ken Swenerton, Stan Kaye, Robert Coleman, Gordon Jayson, Tien Le, Susan Ellard, Marc Trudeau, Paul Vasey, Marta Hamilton, Terri Cameron, Emma Barrett, Wendy Walsh, Lynn McIntosh, Elizabeth A Eisenhauer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Liposomal lurtotecan (OSI-211) is a liposomal formulation of the water-soluble topoisomerase I inhibitor lurtotecan (GI147211), which demonstrated superior levels of activity compared with topotecan in preclinical models. We studied two schedules of OSI-211 in a randomized design in relapsed ovarian cancer to identify the more promising of the two schedules for further study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had measurable epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer that was recurrent after one or two prior regimens of chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either arm A (OSI-211 1.8 mg/m(2)/d administered by 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 2, and 3 every 3 weeks) or arm B (OSI-211 2.4 mg/m(2)/d administered by 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks). The primary outcome measure was objective response, which was confirmed by independent radiologic review, and a pick the winner statistical design was used to identify the schedule most likely to be superior.
RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were randomized between October 2000 and September 2001. The hematologic toxic effects were greater on arm A than on arm B (grade 4 neutropenia, 51% v 22%, respectively), as was febrile neutropenia (26% v 2.4%, respectively). Of the 80 eligible patients, eight patients (10%) had objective responses; six responders (15.4%; 95% CI, 6% to 30%) were in arm A and two responders (4.9%; 95% CI, 1% to 17%) were in arm B.
CONCLUSION: The OSI-211 daily for 3 days intravenous schedule met the statistical criteria to be declared the winner in terms of objective response. This schedule was also associated with more myelosuppression than the schedule of OSI-211 administered in arm B.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15699482     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  10 in total

Review 1.  Best practices in cancer nanotechnology: perspective from NCI nanotechnology alliance.

Authors:  William C Zamboni; Vladimir Torchilin; Anil K Patri; Jeff Hrkach; Stephen Stern; Robert Lee; Andre Nel; Nicholas J Panaro; Piotr Grodzinski
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Camptothecin (CPT) and its derivatives are known to target topoisomerase I (Top1) as their mechanism of action: did we miss something in CPT analogue molecular targets for treating human disease such as cancer?

Authors:  Fengzhi Li; Tao Jiang; Qingyong Li; Xiang Ling
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 3.  The Globalization of Cooperative Groups.

Authors:  Manuel Valdivieso; Benjamin W Corn; Janet E Dancey; D Lawrence Wickerham; L Elise Horvath; Edith A Perez; Alison Urton; Walter M Cronin; Erica Field; Evonne Lackey; Charles D Blanke
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 4.  Development of nanoscale approaches for ovarian cancer therapeutics and diagnostics.

Authors:  Sarah A Engelberth; Nadine Hempel; Magnus Bergkvist
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncog       Date:  2014

5.  Therapeutic regulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and immune response to cancer vaccine in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Iclozan; Scott Antonia; Alberto Chiappori; Dung-Tsa Chen; Dmitry Gabrilovich
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 6.  Cancer therapies utilizing the camptothecins: a review of the in vivo literature.

Authors:  Vincent J Venditto; Eric E Simanek
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  A Bayesian pick-the-winner design in a randomized phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  Dung-Tsa Chen; Po-Yu Huang; Hui-Yi Lin; Alberto A Chiappori; Dmitry I Gabrilovich; Eric B Haura; Scott J Antonia; Jhanelle E Gray
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-07

Review 8.  Stealth liposomes: review of the basic science, rationale, and clinical applications, existing and potential.

Authors:  Maria Laura Immordino; Franco Dosio; Luigi Cattel
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2006

Review 9.  Advances and Challenges of Liposome Assisted Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Lisa Sercombe; Tejaswi Veerati; Fatemeh Moheimani; Sherry Y Wu; Anil K Sood; Susan Hua
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Science and technology of the emerging nanomedicines in cancer therapy: A primer for physicians and pharmacists.

Authors:  Gopalakrishna Pillai; Maria L Ceballos-Coronel
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2013-11-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.