Literature DB >> 15696856

Results of radio frequency ablation of primary and secondary liver tumors: long-term follow-up with computed tomography and positron emission tomography-18F-deoxyfluoroglucose scanning.

T J Blokhuis1, M C van der Schaaf, M P van den Tol, E F I Comans, R A Manoliu, J R M van der Sijp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the literature, promising results have been obtained with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of primary liver malignancies (e.g. hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC) and secondary liver malignancies (e.g. metastases of colorectal tumors). In our center, positron emission tomography with FDG (FDG-PET) and computed tomography (CT) were used for follow-up. Patient outcome was compared with that in the literature, and PET and CT were analyzed regarding positive and negative predictive values for early detection of tumor recurrence.
METHODS: The data were analyzed of patients who were treated with RFA for primary or secondary liver tumors between January 1999 and December 2002. Indications for treatment with RFA were liver tumors that could not be resected owing to size, number, or tumor location. In all patients, a CT scan was performed before RFA, and follow-up was performed with a CT scan in all patients and with an additional PET scan at various intervals in 11 patients. At evaluation with PET, tumor recurrence was defined as positive uptake of tracer either at the previous RFA lesion or at a new site in the liver.
RESULTS: In total, 15 patients (8 M, 7 F) were treated in 21 sessions with RFA. The mean follow-up period was 16.8 months (range: 7-42). Average age of the patients was 63 years (range: 40-74). One patient had a primary liver tumor; all other patients had metastases of the breast (1), ovary (1), renal cells (1), and colorectal carcinoma (11 patients). The mean number of tumors per patient was 2.7 (range: 1-5). No treatment-related morbidity or mortality occurred. In 4 of 11 patients evaluated with PET at a mean period of 6.8 months, positive uptake of tracer was noted. At CT evaluation, tumor recurrence was observed in 4 of these patients, at a mean time of 9.8 months. Two patients (13.3%) died of cancer recurrence during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor recurrence is comparable with that in other studies. Centrally located tumors showed more recurrence than peripheral tumors. The use of PET in combination with CT scan at follow-up may lead to earlier detection of tumor recurrence than contrast-enhanced CT alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15696856     DOI: 10.1080/00855920410014623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl        ISSN: 0085-5928


  10 in total

Review 1.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Differentiation of benign periablational enhancement from residual tumor following radio-frequency ablation using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in a rat subcutaneous colon cancer model.

Authors:  Hanping Wu; Ravi B Patel; Yuanyi Zheng; Luis Solorio; Tianyi M Krupka; Nicholas P Ziats; John R Haaga; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Immediate Postablation 18F-FDG Injection and Corresponding SUV Are Surrogate Biomarkers of Local Tumor Progression After Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Carcinoma Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Francois H Cornelis; Elena N Petre; Efsevia Vakiani; David Klimstra; Jeremy C Durack; Mithat Gonen; Joseph Osborne; Stephen B Solomon; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Positron emission tomography for staging and assessment of tumor response of hepatic malignancies.

Authors:  Robert S Hellman; Arthur Z Krasnow; Gary S Sudakoff
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Incidence and treatment of local site recurrences following RFA of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Karin Nielsen; Aukje A J M van Tilborg; Martijn R Meijerink; Matessa O Macintosh; Babs M Zonderhuis; Elly S M de Lange; Emile F I Comans; Sybren Meijer; M Petrousjka van den Tol
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Positron emission tomography/computer tomography: challenge to conventional imaging modalities in evaluating primary and metastatic liver malignancies.

Authors:  Long Sun; Hua Wu; Yong-Song Guan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Ahmad Almuhaideb; Nikolaos Papathanasiou; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

8.  FDG-PET in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Theo J M Ruers; Cornelis J A Punt; Jan Willem Leer; Frans H M Corstens; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 9.  Colorectal cancer: the role of PET/CT in recurrence.

Authors:  Wouter V Vogel; Bastiaan Wiering; Frans H M Corstens; Theo J M Ruers; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Predictive and prognostic value of FDG-PET.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.909

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.