Literature DB >> 15696744

Testing adaptive plasticity to UV: costs and benefits of stem elongation and light-induced phenolics.

Cynthia Weinig1, Kelly A Gravuer, Nolan C Kane, Johanna Schmitt.   

Abstract

On exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UV), many plant species both reduce stem elongation and increase production of phenolic compounds that absorb in the UV region of the spectrum. To demonstrate that such developmental plasticity to UV is adaptive, it is necessary to show that the induced phenotype is both beneficial in inductive environments and maladaptive in non-inductive environments. We measured selection on stem elongation and phenolic content of seedlings of Impatiens capensis transplanted into ambient-UV and UV-removal treatments. We extended the range of phenotypes expressed, and thus the opportunity for selection in each UV treatment, by pretreating seedlings with either a low ratio of red:far-red wavelengths (R:FR), which induced stem elongation and reduced phenolic concentrations, or high R:FR, which had the opposite effect on these two phenotypic traits. Reduced stem length relative to biomass was advantageous for elongated plants under ambient UV, whereas increased elongation was favored in the UV-removal treatment. Selection favored an increase in the level of phenolics induced by UV in the ambient-UV treatment, but a decrease in phenolics in the absence of UV. These results are consistent with the hypotheses that reduced elongation and increased phenolic concentrations serve a UV-protective function and provide the first explicit demonstration in a wild species that plasticity of these traits to UV is adaptive. The observed cost to phenolics in the absence of UV may explain why many species plastically upregulate phenolic production when exposed to UV, rather than evolve constitutively high levels of these compounds. Finally, pretreatment with low R:FR simulating foliar shade did not exacerbate the fitness impact of UV exposure when plants had several weeks to acclimate to UV. This observation suggests that the evolution of adaptive shade avoidance responses to low R:FR in crowded stands will not be constrained by increased sensitivity to UV in elongated plants when they overtop their neighbors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15696744     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01618.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

Review 1.  Effects of dispersal plasticity on population divergence and speciation.

Authors:  J D Arendt
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Dependence of functional traits related to growth rates and their CO2 response on multiple habitat climate factors across Arabidopsis thaliana populations.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ozaki; Riichi Oguchi; Kouki Hikosaka
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  A three-dimensional spatial mapping approach to quantify fine-scale heterogeneity among leaves within canopies.

Authors:  Jenna L Wingfield; Lauren G Ruane; Joshua D Patterson
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 1.936

Review 4.  The impact of beneficial plant-associated microbes on plant phenotypic plasticity.

Authors:  Chooi-Hua Goh; Debora F Veliz Vallejos; Adrienne B Nicotra; Ulrike Mathesius
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  UV radiation is the primary factor driving the variation in leaf phenolics across Chinese grasslands.

Authors:  Litong Chen; Kechang Niu; Yi Wu; Yan Geng; Zhaorong Mi; Dan Fb Flynn; Jin-Sheng He
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Effect of Sunlight Radiation on the Growth and Chemical Constituents of Salvia plebeia R.Br.

Authors:  Hyun-Jae Jang; Seung-Jae Lee; Cha Young Kim; Joo Tae Hwang; Jung Ho Choi; Jee Hun Park; Seung Woong Lee; Mun-Chual Rho
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.