OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the effect of supplemental antioxidant vitamins C and E on the rate of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN:Women at risk for preeclampsia (previous preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, or multifetal gestation) were recruited at 14 to 20 weeks' gestation and randomly assigned to receive either 1000 mg of vitamin C and 400 IU of vitamin E or placebo daily in addition to their regular prenatal vitamins. The primary outcome was the occurrence of preeclampsia. An estimated sample size of 220 women in each arm was determined to be necessary to demonstrate a 50% reduction in the rate of preeclampsia. RESULTS: Funding was terminated after 109 women had been recruited; 9 were lost to follow-up or withdrew. We analyzed data from the remaining 100 women to look for differences in outcome and to estimate the required sample size for future studies. The rate of preeclampsia was not different: 17.3% in women who received supplemental vitamins C and E, versus 18.8% in the placebo group. Assuming a baseline rate of preeclampsia in the placebo group between 15% and 20%, we can estimate that 500 to 950 women in each arm will be required to show a clinically important reduction in the rate of preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: The potential benefit of vitamin C and E supplementation to prevent preeclampsia in women with clinical risk factors is smaller than we estimated. Future studies of antioxidant vitamin supplementation in this population will require more than 500 women in each arm.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the effect of supplemental antioxidant vitamins C and E on the rate of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN:Women at risk for preeclampsia (previous preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, or multifetal gestation) were recruited at 14 to 20 weeks' gestation and randomly assigned to receive either 1000 mg of vitamin C and 400 IU of vitamin E or placebo daily in addition to their regular prenatal vitamins. The primary outcome was the occurrence of preeclampsia. An estimated sample size of 220 women in each arm was determined to be necessary to demonstrate a 50% reduction in the rate of preeclampsia. RESULTS: Funding was terminated after 109 women had been recruited; 9 were lost to follow-up or withdrew. We analyzed data from the remaining 100 women to look for differences in outcome and to estimate the required sample size for future studies. The rate of preeclampsia was not different: 17.3% in women who received supplemental vitamins C and E, versus 18.8% in the placebo group. Assuming a baseline rate of preeclampsia in the placebo group between 15% and 20%, we can estimate that 500 to 950 women in each arm will be required to show a clinically important reduction in the rate of preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: The potential benefit of vitamin C and E supplementation to prevent preeclampsia in women with clinical risk factors is smaller than we estimated. Future studies of antioxidant vitamin supplementation in this population will require more than 500 women in each arm.
Authors: Kiran B Tam Tam; Babbette Lamarca; Marietta Arany; Kathy Cockrell; Lillian Fournier; Sydney Murphy; James N Martin; Joey P Granger Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Olukunmi O Balogun; Katharina da Silva Lopes; Erika Ota; Yo Takemoto; Alice Rumbold; Mizuki Takegata; Rintaro Mori Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-05-06
Authors: Christopher P Corpe; Hongbin Tu; Peter Eck; Jin Wang; Robert Faulhaber-Walter; Jurgen Schnermann; Sam Margolis; Sebastian Padayatty; He Sun; Yaohui Wang; Robert L Nussbaum; Michael Graham Espey; Mark Levine Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Joseph A Spinnato; Salvio Freire; Joao Luiz Pinto e Silva; Marilza Vieira Cunha Rudge; Sérgio Martins-Costa; Matthew A Koch; Norman Goco; Cleide de Barros Santos; Jose Guilherme Cecatti; Roberto Costa; José Geraldo Ramos; Nancy Moss; Baha M Sibai Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Emily Oken; Yi Ning; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Sjurdur F Olsen; Matthew W Gillman Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2007-05-23 Impact factor: 3.797