Literature DB >> 15695777

Prognostic value of automated quantification of 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging.

William D Leslie1, Shawn A Tully, Marina S Yogendran, Linda M Ward, Khaled A Nour, Colleen J Metge.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Although human interpretation of (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging has been repeatedly validated in the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of coronary artery disease, it remains unclear if automated computer-derived quantitative indices of perfusion have similar or independent prognostic information.
METHODS: We studied 718 patients referred for (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging who were followed for 5.6 +/- 1.1 y (mean +/- SD). The SPECT studies were initially interpreted visually without benefit of computer-based analysis and were then subjected to a blinded reprocessing to extract quantitative indices of perfusion. Follow-up was through the Manitoba Population Health Research Data Repository. Acute myocardial infarction or cardiac death occurred in 79 individuals (11.0% of the cohort).
RESULTS: Visual and quantitative categorization of scan perfusion abnormalities showed similar prognostic value for predicting acute myocardial infarction or cardiac death. Discordance between the visual and quantitative categorizations defined a group at intermediate risk. There was a gradient of risk with increasing severity of the summed stress score (SSS) or summed difference score (SDS). The automated SSS and SDS provided incremental prognostic information over that obtained from visual interpretation.
CONCLUSION: Automated quantification of (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion scans provides objective prognostic information and may complement the conventional visual image interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15695777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  32 in total

1.  Prognostic value of automated vs visual analysis for adenosine stress myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without prior coronary artery disease: a case-control study.

Authors:  Yuan Xu; Ryo Nakazato; Sean Hayes; Rory Hachamovitch; Victor Y Cheng; Heidi Gransar; Romalisa Miranda-Peats; Mark Hyun; Leslee J Shaw; John Friedman; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Prognostic implications of post-stress ejection fraction decrease detected by gated SPECT in the absence of stress-induced perfusion abnormalities.

Authors:  Manjola Dona; Lucia Massi; Leonardo Settimo; Matteo Bartolini; Gianluca Giannì; Alberto Pupi; Roberto Sciagrà
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Quantitative analysis of perfusion studies: strengths and pitfalls.

Authors:  Piotr Slomka; Yuan Xu; Daniel Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Incorporation of a left ventricle finite element model defining infarction into the XCAT imaging phantom.

Authors:  Alexander I Veress; W Paul Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui; Grant T Gullberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Abnormal response to mental stress in patients with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy detected by gated single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Guido Parodi; Stefano Del Pace; Sabrina Genovese; Linda Zampini; Benedetta Bellandi; Gian Franco Gensini; Alberto Pupi; David Antoniucci
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  It's not all in the numbers.

Authors:  Mark I Travin
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications.

Authors:  Ernest V Garcia; Piotr Slomka; Jonathan B Moody; Guido Germano; Edward P Ficaro
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Fully automated analysis of perfusion data: The rise of the machines.

Authors:  Rupa M Sanghani; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Ian S Armstrong; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; E Gordon DePuey; Andrew J Einstein; Robert J Gropler; Thomas A Holly; John J Mahmarian; Mi-Ae Park; Donna M Polk; Raymond Russell; Piotr J Slomka; Randall C Thompson; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Prognostic value of quantitative high-speed myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Daniel S Berman; Heidi Gransar; Mark Hyun; Romalisa Miranda-Peats; Faith C Kite; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Alan Rozanski; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.