| Literature DB >> 15695222 |
Abstract
In his primary thesis on the purely perceptual-cognitive nature of movement control, F. Mechsner (2004) entirely neglects, or in fact negates, the influences of action on perception. In this commentary, the author follows the logical steps of Mechsner, illustrates what he conceives to be an error in Mechsner's reasoning, and synthesizes those arguments in favor of a hypothesis of a system of equivalent elements (senses and effectors) in interaction.Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15695222 DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2004.11008001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mot Behav ISSN: 0022-2895 Impact factor: 1.328