Literature DB >> 15694973

Handwashing in the intensive care unit: a big measure with modest effects.

L Silvestri1, A J Petros, R E Sarginson, M A de la Cal, A E Murray, H K F van Saene.   

Abstract

Handwashing is widely accepted as the cornerstone of infection control in the intensive care unit. Nosocomial infections are frequently viewed as an indicator of poor compliance of handwashing. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of handwashing on infection rates in the intensive care unit, and to analyse the failure of handwashing. A literature search identified nine studies that evaluated the impact of handwashing or hand hygiene on infection rates, and demonstrated a low level of evidence for the efforts to control infection with handwashing. Poor compliance cannot be blamed as the only reason for the failure of handwashing to control infection. Handwashing on its own does not abolish, but only reduces transmission, as it is dependent on the bacterial load on the hand of healthcare workers. Finally, recent studies, using surveillance cultures of throat and rectum, have shown that, under ideal circumstances, handwashing can only influence 40% of all intensive care unit infections. A randomised clinical trial with the intensive care as randomisation unit is required to support handwashing as the cornerstone of infection control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15694973     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  7 in total

1.  Enteral vancomycin controls methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endemicity in an intensive care burn unit: a 9-year prospective study.

Authors:  Enrique Cerdá; Ana Abella; Miguel A de la Cal; José A Lorente; Paloma García-Hierro; Hendrick K F van Saene; Inmaculada Alía; Ainhoa Aranguren
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Effectiveness and limitations of hand hygiene promotion on decreasing healthcare-associated infections.

Authors:  Yee-Chun Chen; Wang-Huei Sheng; Jann-Tay Wang; Shan-Chwen Chang; Hui-Chi Lin; Kuei-Lien Tien; Le-Yin Hsu; Keh-Sung Tsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Impact of single room design on the spread of multi-drug resistant bacteria in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Teysir Halaby; Nashwan Al Naiemi; Bert Beishuizen; Roel Verkooijen; José A Ferreira; Rob Klont; Christina Vandenbroucke-Grauls
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.887

4.  Environmental contaminants in hospital settings and progress in disinfecting techniques.

Authors:  Gabriele Messina; Emma Ceriale; Daniele Lenzi; Sandra Burgassi; Elena Azzolini; Pietro Manzi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  To determine the effect of wearing shoe covers by medical staff and visitors on infection rates, mortality and length of stay in Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Zeeshan Ali; Aayesha Qadeer; Aftab Akhtar
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  Evidence-based interventions to reduce adverse events in hospitals: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Marieke Zegers; Gijs Hesselink; Wytske Geense; Charles Vincent; Hub Wollersheim
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Optimizing Health Care Environmental Hygiene.

Authors:  Philip C Carling
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.982

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.