| Literature DB >> 1569487 |
M Carpani de Kaski1, A M Peters, D Knight, A W Stuttle, J P Lavender, H J Hodgson.
Abstract
Quantification of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been by measurement of fecal excretion of 111In-granulocytes. The difficulties of this method prompted us to evaluate quantification of whole-body 111In retention, expressed as a percentage of whole-body activity at 3 hr following injection, as an alternative method. The patient stood in front of the uncollimated gamma camera at a distance of 4 m and counts were collected over 2 min. The geometric mean was taken of posterior and anterior counts and compared with a 111In standard. The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for whole-body retention in normals was 90%. Forty-five studies were performed on 33 patients with IBD. They were assessed in two groups, one to whom routine instructions for the collection of feces were given (Group A) but who did not always comply. The other group received oral and written instructions and were also monitored during the collection period (Group B) and reported full fecal collection. Although in Group A the correlation between fecal excretion and whole-body retention was good (r = 0.7, n = 32; p less than 0.001), in Group B the relationship between fecal excretion and whole-body retention was significantly better (r = 0.95, n = 18; p less than 0.001). On average, 111In whole-body retention was consistent with findings obtained during imaging: 111In excretion (100-whole-body retention) was 7.8% +/- 4.9% in 5 normal scans, 10% +/- 5.9% in 17 (+) scans, 22.3% +/- 8% in 20 (++) scans and 57% +/- 16% in 8 ( ) scans. We conclude that imaging is more sensitive than whole-body retention and fecal excretion in the detection of disease, but for quantification, whole-body retention is an accurate reliable alternative to fecal excretion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1992 PMID: 1569487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nucl Med ISSN: 0161-5505 Impact factor: 10.057