Literature DB >> 15694632

Privacy protection for clinical and genomic data. The use of privacy-enhancing techniques in medicine.

B Claerhout1, G J E DeMoor.   

Abstract

Privacy includes the right of individuals and organisations to determine for themselves when, how and to what extent information about them is communicated to others. The growing need of managing large amounts of both clinical and genetic data raises important legal and ethical challenges. This paper introduces some of the privacy-protection problems related to classical and genomic medicine, and highlights the relevance of trusted third parties and of privacy-enhancing techniques (PETs) in the context of data collection, e.g., for research. Practical approaches based on two pseudonymisation models, for both batch data collection and interactive data storage, are presented. The actual application of the described techniques today proves the possible benefits for medicine that innovative privacy-enhancing techniques can provide. Technical PET solutions can unlock valuable data sources, otherwise not available.

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15694632     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  4 in total

1.  Recognition and pseudonymisation of medical records for secondary use.

Authors:  Johannes Heurix; Stefan Fenz; Antonio Rella; Thomas Neubauer
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Personal genomic information management and personalized medicine: challenges, current solutions, and roles of HIM professionals.

Authors:  Amal Alzu'bi; Leming Zhou; Valerie Watzlaf
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2014-04-01

3.  Pseudonymization of patient identifiers for translational research.

Authors:  Harald Aamot; Christian Dominik Kohl; Daniela Richter; Petra Knaup-Gregori
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Patient and public views about the security and privacy of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in the UK: results from a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Julie E Reed; Cicely Marston; Ruth Lewis; Azeem Majeed; Derek Bell
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.