L Pearson1, R Shoo. 1. UNICEF Regional Office of Eastern and Southern Africa (ESARO), EmOC Working Group on Indicators, Gigiri, Nairobi, Kenya. lwpearson@unicef.org
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The article summarises the baseline assessments of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) carried out in Uganda, Kenya, Southern Sudan, and Rwanda in 2003 and 2004. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to: (1) set up program baselines on the availability and utilization of EmOC services in these countries; (2) identify gaps and obstacles in providing EmOC services; and (3) make recommendations to governments based on evidence generated. METHODS: Data were collected from clinical record reviews, provider and client interviews, observations, and focus group discussions. Either random or universal sampling was applied in the selection of health facilities assessed. Local nurses and midwives participated in the data collection and, to some extent, data processing and analysis. RESULTS: The coverage of basic EmOC services ranged 0-1.1/500,000 population compared to the UN-recommended level of 4/500,000. The coverage of comprehensive EmOC services ranged 0.5-4.3/500,000 compared to the recommended level of 1/500,000. Between 0.6% and 8.8% of all births took place in EmOC facilities, and 2.1% and 18.5% of all expected direct obstetric complications were treated. Cesarean section as a proportion of all births was between 0.1% and 1%. Shortage of trained staff especially mid-level providers, poor basic infrastructure such as lack of electricity and water supplies, inadequate supply of drugs and essential equipment, poor working conditions and staff morale, lack of communication and referral facilities, cost of treatment, and lack of accountability and proper management were identified as the main obstacles in providing 24-h quality EmOC services especially in remote and rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of basic EmOC services limits women's access to life-saving services during obstetric complications. To reduce maternal mortality ratio the states and development partners need to focus their effort to improve the coverage, quality, and utilization of EmOC services through supportive national policy, effective program strategies, increased budget allocation to maternal health program, rural infrastructure development, and regular monitoring, and evaluation of progress.
UNLABELLED: The article summarises the baseline assessments of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) carried out in Uganda, Kenya, Southern Sudan, and Rwanda in 2003 and 2004. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to: (1) set up program baselines on the availability and utilization of EmOC services in these countries; (2) identify gaps and obstacles in providing EmOC services; and (3) make recommendations to governments based on evidence generated. METHODS: Data were collected from clinical record reviews, provider and client interviews, observations, and focus group discussions. Either random or universal sampling was applied in the selection of health facilities assessed. Local nurses and midwives participated in the data collection and, to some extent, data processing and analysis. RESULTS: The coverage of basic EmOC services ranged 0-1.1/500,000 population compared to the UN-recommended level of 4/500,000. The coverage of comprehensive EmOC services ranged 0.5-4.3/500,000 compared to the recommended level of 1/500,000. Between 0.6% and 8.8% of all births took place in EmOC facilities, and 2.1% and 18.5% of all expected direct obstetric complications were treated. Cesarean section as a proportion of all births was between 0.1% and 1%. Shortage of trained staff especially mid-level providers, poor basic infrastructure such as lack of electricity and water supplies, inadequate supply of drugs and essential equipment, poor working conditions and staff morale, lack of communication and referral facilities, cost of treatment, and lack of accountability and proper management were identified as the main obstacles in providing 24-h quality EmOC services especially in remote and rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of basic EmOC services limits women's access to life-saving services during obstetric complications. To reduce maternal mortality ratio the states and development partners need to focus their effort to improve the coverage, quality, and utilization of EmOC services through supportive national policy, effective program strategies, increased budget allocation to maternal health program, rural infrastructure development, and regular monitoring, and evaluation of progress.
Authors: Doruk Ozgediz; Renee Hsia; Thomas Weiser; Richard Gosselin; David Spiegel; Stephen Bickler; Peter Dunbar; Kelly McQueen Journal: World J Surg Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Francesca L Cavallaro; Jenny A Cresswell; Giovanny Va França; Cesar G Victora; Aluísio Jd Barros; Carine Ronsmans Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2013-08-09 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Marguerite Hoyler; Samuel R G Finlayson; Craig D McClain; John G Meara; Lars Hagander Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Sara E Casey; Kathleen T Mitchell; Immaculée Mulamba Amisi; Martin Migombano Haliza; Blandine Aveledi; Prince Kalenga; Judy Austin Journal: Confl Health Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 2.723
Authors: Sam Luboga; Sarah B Macfarlane; Johan von Schreeb; Margaret E Kruk; Meena N Cherian; Staffan Bergström; Paul B M Bossyns; Ernest Denerville; Delanyo Dovlo; Moses Galukande; Renee Y Hsia; Sudha P Jayaraman; Lindsey A Lubbock; Charles Mock; Doruk Ozgediz; Patrick Sekimpi; Andreas Wladis; Ahmed Zakariah; Naméoua Babadi Dade; Peter Donkor; Jane Kabutu Gatumbu; Patrick Hoekman; Carel B Ijsselmuiden; Dean T Jamison; Nasreen Jessani; Peter Jiskoot; Ignatius Kakande; Jacqueline R Mabweijano; Naboth Mbembati; Colin McCord; Cephas Mijumbi; Helder de Miranda; Charles A Mkony; Pascoal Mocumbi; Jean Bosco Ndihokubwayo; Pierre Ngueumachi; Gebreamlak Ogbaselassie; Evariste Lodi Okitombahe; Cheikh Tidiane Toure; Fernando Vaz; Charlotte M Zikusooka; Haile T Debas Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-12-22 Impact factor: 11.069