Literature DB >> 15694104

Ultrasound biometry of Arabian fetuses.

H Nasrat1, N S Bondagji.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish fetal ultrasound biometry charts for Arabian fetuses between 14 and 40 weeks of gestation.
METHOD: Cross-sectional fetal ultrasound data of normal singleton pregnancies, which had been performed over a period of 7 years, were retrieved. Only pregnant Arab women with certain last menstrual period dates and/or early ultrasound examinations were included. Each fetus contributed to only one set of data. Normal ranges for biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) were established. The mean and 5th and 95th percentiles at 18th, 28th, and 36 weeks of gestation were compared with similar ranges of published data from pregnancies of American and Anglo-Saxon population.
RESULTS: Fetal ultrasound biometry has been established for our local population. Comparing our data with Western population emphasizes the presence of significant variation in fetal morphometric measurements, particularly in the later weeks of gestation and at the extremes of the range of fetal size.
CONCLUSION: The clinical significance of this variation differs according to the primary objective of ultrasound fetal measurements. For estimation of fetal age, usually by head and femur measurements in early gestation, ethnic variation seems to have limited significance. Whereas for estimation of fetal growth and/or weight in the third trimester, based on abdominal circumference, the use of given points, e.g., 10th or 5th percentile derived from other population charts, has the potential of either over- or underdiagnosis of IUGR fetuses. The adoption of locally developed charts is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15694104     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  4 in total

1.  Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania.

Authors:  Bronius Žaliūnas; Vaidilė Jakaitė; Juozas Kurmanavičius; Daiva Bartkevičienė; Kristina Norvilaitė; Karolina Passerini
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Unified standard for fetal growth: the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies.

Authors:  Katherine L Grantz; Jagteshwar Grewal; Sungduk Kim; William A Grobman; Roger B Newman; John Owen; Anthony Sciscione; Daniel Skupski; Edward K Chien; Deborah A Wing; Ronald J Wapner; Angela C Ranzini; Michael P Nageotte; Sabrina Craigo; Stefanie N Hinkle; Mary E D'Alton; Dian He; Fasil Tekola-Ayele; Mary L Hediger; Germaine M Buck Louis; Cuilin Zhang; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 10.693

Review 3.  Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Mario Merialdi; Lawrence D Platt; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Fetal Growth Curves: Is There a Universal Reference?

Authors:  Katherine L Grantz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.838

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.