Literature DB >> 15694103

Factors associated with inadequate prenatal care in Ecuadorian women.

I Paredes1, L Hidalgo, P Chedraui, J Palma, J Eugenio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although inadequate prenatal care has been associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, reports on the factors associated with poor prenatal care in developing Latin American countries are scarce.
OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with inadequate prenatal care among women from low socioeconomic circumstances.
METHOD: Women delivered after a pregnancy duration of more than 20 weeks at the Enrique C. Sotomayor Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Guayaquil, Ecuador, were surveyed. The questionnaire collected sociodemographic data and reasons for having inadequate prenatal care. Adequacy of prenatal care was measured with the Kessner index and correlated to the sociodemographic data.
RESULTS: During the study period, 1016 pregnant women were surveyed. Among them, there were adolescents (23.7%), primigravidas (30.8%), and women with a high-risk pregnancy (29.3%). According to the Kessner index, prenatal care was considered adequate or inadequate in 24.5% and 75.5% of cases, respectively. Knowledge regarding the importance of adequate prenatal care and the effects of poor prenatal care was lower among women who had received inadequate prenatal care. The women that were considered to have had adequate prenatal care had at least one visit, and they were more often cared for by a specialist than women who considered having inadequate prenatal care. The three most important reasons associated to inadequate prenatal care in this series (n=767), were economic difficulties having to care for a small child, and transportation difficulties. Logistic regression analysis determined that women with undesired pregnancies who resided in rural areas and were para 5 or higher had an increased risk of inadequate prenatal care. On the other hand, an adverse outcome to a prior pregnancy (abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, or ectopic pregnancy) decreased this risk. Marital status and educational level were confounding factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Although prenatal care at our institution is free, adequacy was thought to be low. The main factors associated with poor prenatal care were mostly conditions related to poverty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15694103     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  26 in total

1.  Inadequate prenatal care use among Canadian mothers: findings from the Maternity Experiences Survey.

Authors:  Y Debessai; C Costanian; M Roy; M El-Sayed; H Tamim
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Association of county perinatal resources and gestational weight gain in West Virginia, United States.

Authors:  Wilson A Koech; Christa L Lilly
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Ethnic/racial disparities in the fetal growth outcomes of Ecuadorian newborns.

Authors:  M Margaret Weigel; Maria Elena Caiza Sanchez
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2013-02

4.  Barriers to adequate prenatal care utilization in American Samoa.

Authors:  Nicola L Hawley; Carolyn Brown; Ofeira Nu'usolia; John Ah-Ching; Bethel Muasau-Howard; Stephen T McGarvey
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-12

5.  Factors affecting adequate prenatal care and the prenatal care visits of immigrant women to Taiwan.

Authors:  Yia-Wun Liang; Hua-Pin Chang; Yu-Hsiu Lin; Long-Yau Lin; Wen-Yi Chen
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-02

6.  Stillbirth and early neonatal mortality in rural Central Africa.

Authors:  Cyril Engmann; Richard Matendo; Rinko Kinoshita; John Ditekemena; Janet Moore; Robert L Goldenberg; Antoinette Tshefu; Waldemar A Carlo; Elizabeth M McClure; Carl Bose; Linda L Wright
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  Relationship between adequacy of prenatal care utilization index and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Tahereh Tayebi; Shahnaz Turk Zahrani; Rezaali Mohammadpour
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2013-09

8.  Disparities in the use of antenatal care service in Ethiopia over a period of fifteen years.

Authors:  Elias Ali Yesuf; Ronit Calderon-Margalit
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Factors associated with antenatal care adequacy in rural and urban contexts-results from two health and demographic surveillance sites in Vietnam.

Authors:  Toan K Tran; Karin Gottvall; Hinh D Nguyen; Henry Ascher; Max Petzold
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Determinants of antenatal care, institutional delivery and postnatal care services utilization in Nigeria.

Authors:  Tukur Dahiru; Oche Mansur Oche
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.