Literature DB >> 15693929

Bedside interactions from the other side of the bedrail.

Kathlyn E Fletcher1, David S Rankey, David T Stern.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the importance to patients of various aspects of bedside interactions with physician teams.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: VA hospital. PATIENTS: Ninety-seven medical inpatients. INTERVENTION: Survey of 44 questions including short answer, multiple choice, and Likert-type questions.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data analysis included descriptive statistics. The sample was predominantly male, with a mean age of 62. Overall satisfaction with the hospital experience and with the team of doctors were both high (95% and 96% reported being very or mostly satisfied, respectively). Patients reported learning about several issues during their interactions with the teams; the 3 most highly rated areas were new problems, tests that will be done, and treatments that will be done. Most patients (76%) felt that their teams cared about them very much. Patients were made comfortable when the team showed that they cared, listened, and appeared relaxed (reported by 63%, 57%, and 54%, respectively). Patients were made uncomfortable by the team using language they did not understand (22%) and when several people examined them at once (13%). Many (58%) patients felt personally involved in teaching. The majority of patients liked having medical students and residents involved in their care (69% and 64%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients have much to teach about what is important about interacting with physician teams. Although patients' reactions to team interactions are generally positive, patients are different with respect to what makes them comfortable and uncomfortable. Taking their preferences into account could improve the experience of being in a teaching hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15693929      PMCID: PMC1490039          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40192.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  11 in total

1.  Whither bedside teaching? A focus-group study of clinical teachers.

Authors:  Subha Ramani; Jay D Orlander; Lee Strunin; Thomas W Barber
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Student and patient perspectives on bedside teaching.

Authors:  B R Nair; J L Coughlan; M J Hensley
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  A new instrument for patients' ratings of physician performance in the hospital setting.

Authors:  D A Matthews; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Sounding Boards. The case of bedside rounds.

Authors:  E W Linfors; F A Neelon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-11-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Development of the Trust in Physician scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships.

Authors:  L A Anderson; R F Dedrick
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1990-12

6.  On bedside teaching.

Authors:  M A LaCombe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Examination room presentations in general internal medicine clinic: patients' and students' perceptions.

Authors:  Heather D Rogers; Jan D Carline; Douglas S Paauw
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Patients speak: what's really important about bedside interactions with physician teams.

Authors:  Kathlyn E Fletcher; Scott L Furney; David T Stern
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.414

9.  Bedside case presentations: why patients like them but learners don't.

Authors:  R M Wang-Cheng; G P Barnas; P Sigmann; P A Riendl; M J Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The effect of bedside case presentations on patients' perceptions of their medical care.

Authors:  L S Lehmann; F L Brancati; M C Chen; D Roter; A S Dobs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

1.  A qualitative study of the meaning of physical examination teaching for patients.

Authors:  Katherine C Chretien; Ellen F Goldman; Katherine E Craven; Charles J Faselis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Patient-centered collaborative care: the impact of a new approach to postpartum rounds on residents' perception of their work environment.

Authors:  Maureen Baldwin; Jason Hashima; Jeanne-Marie Guise; William Thomas Gregory; Alison Edelman; Sally Segel
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-03

3.  Are medical students accepted by patients in teaching hospitals?

Authors:  Yousef Marwan; Muhammad Al-Saddique; Adnan Hassan; Jumanah Karim; Mervat Al-Saleh
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2012-04-11

4.  Patient outlook on bedside teaching in a medical school.

Authors:  Pritam A Shetty; Rahul Magazine; Bharti Chogtu
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-03

Review 5.  Validation of a questionnaire exploring patient attitudes towards bedside teaching.

Authors:  M O Carey; N O'Riordan; M Carty; M Ivers; L K Taylor; M F Higgins
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Medical and surgical ward rounds in teaching hospitals of Kuwait University: students' perceptions.

Authors:  Sara Almutar; Lulwa Altourah; Hussain Sadeq; Jumanah Karim; Yousef Marwan
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2013-09-25

7.  Patient perspectives of bedside teaching in an obstetrics, Gynaecology and neonatology hospital.

Authors:  Michelle Carty; Nicola O'Riordan; Mary Ivers; Mary F Higgins
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.