Literature DB >> 15693725

Pharmacoeconomic impact of non-compliance with statins.

Andrew M Peterson1, William F McGhan.   

Abstract

There are numerous studies examining the pharmacoeconomic impact of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy on healthcare costs and outcomes. A recently published review demonstrated that the cost-benefit of these agents depends primarily on the risk of developing a coronary event. That is, as the risk of a coronary event increases, the cost-effectiveness ratio decreases. The typical cost per life-year saved (LYS) ranged from USD 1800 to USD 40,000 in patients with pre-existing coronary artery disease (CAD) and from USD 15,000 to > USD 1 million per LYS in patients without pre-existing CAD. The literature is sparse on the pharmacoeconomics of medication non-compliance in patients taking statin medications. Data from two studies suggest that >75% compliance results in decreased coronary events such as myocardial infarction. However, retrospective database analyses indicate that the average compliance rate hovers around the 65% mark. Many of the studies discuss medication non-compliance as a factor, but do not independently analyse compliance pharmacoeconomically. We examined the pharmacoeconomic impact of non-compliance using published studies that contained pharmacoeconomic data and/or compliance data. In general, we used the placebo arm of these published studies as the surrogate marker for complete non-compliance. The results suggest that for almost 100% compliance versus initial non-compliance, the cost effectiveness of statin medications ranges from USD 4500 to over USD 250,000 per LYS depending on patient age, presence or absence of risk factors and whether the statin is being used for primary or secondary prevention. Alternate-day or weekly dosing studies were also used to examine the impact of compliance on cost and health outcomes. Alternate-day dosing represented 50% compliance and weekly dosing 29% compliance. Less than full compliance had the expected effect of worse health outcomes and lower drug costs. However, the studies were small and not designed as true pharmacoeconomic studies looking at the relationship between medication compliance and cost. The results of this review suggest that there needs to be further examination of the relationship between compliance with statins and cost effectiveness, and studies need to include compliance in their data collection and analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15693725     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200523010-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  33 in total

1.  Prescription and adherence to statins of patients with coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  A P Mansur; A P Mattar; C E Tsubo; D T Simão; F R Yoshi; K Daci
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomic consequences of variable patient compliance with prescribed drug regimens.

Authors:  J Urquhart
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapies according to selected patient characteristics.

Authors:  L A Prosser; A A Stinnett; P A Goldman; L W Williams; M G Hunink; L Goldman; M C Weinstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-05-16       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Cost-effectiveness of pravastatin in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T Ashraf; J W Hay; B Pitt; E Wittels; J Crouse; M Davidson; C D Furberg; L Radican
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators.

Authors:  F M Sacks; M A Pfeffer; L A Moye; J L Rouleau; J D Rutherford; T G Cole; L Brown; J W Warnica; J M Arnold; C C Wun; B R Davis; E Braunwald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-03       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis for statin therapies in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease in Italy.

Authors:  P Berto; V Munro; A Gaddi; C Negrini; J Hutton; O Mast
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.859

7.  Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study.

Authors:  J R Downs; M Clearfield; S Weis; E Whitney; D R Shapiro; P A Beere; A Langendorfer; E A Stein; W Kruyer; A M Gotto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Cost-effectiveness of statins.

Authors:  D M Huse; M W Russell; J D Miller; D F Kraemer; R B D'Agostino; R C Ellison; S C Hartz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Adherence to statin treatment and readmission of patients after myocardial infarction: a six year follow up study.

Authors:  L Wei; J Wang; P Thompson; S Wong; A D Struthers; T M MacDonald
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  J Shepherd; S M Cobbe; I Ford; C G Isles; A R Lorimer; P W MacFarlane; J H McKillop; C J Packard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of the prescription and utilization patterns of statins in an Italian local health unit during the period 1994-2003.

Authors:  Paola Deambrosis; Cristina Saramin; Gianni Terrazzani; Luca Scaldaferri; Patrizia Debetto; Pietro Giusti; Alessandro Chinellato
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Predictors of 12-month outcome in smokers who received bupropion sustained-release for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Gary E Swan; Lisa M Jack; Harold S Javitz; Tim McAfee; Jennifer B McClure
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Low bone mineral density is not associated with angiographically determined coronary atherosclerosis in men.

Authors:  S Beer; C H Saely; G Hoefle; P Rein; A Vonbank; J Breuss; B Gaensbacher; A Muendlein; H Drexel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Do patients have duties?

Authors:  H M Evans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  The impact of regional co-payment and national reimbursement criteria on statins use in Italy: an interrupted time-series analysis.

Authors:  Gianfranco Damiani; Bruno Federico; Angela Anselmi; Caterina Bianca Neve Aurora Bianchi; Giulia Silvestrini; Lanfranco Iodice; Pierluigi Navarra; Roberto Da Cas; Roberto Raschetti; Walter Ricciardi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  The economic consequences of noncompliance in cardiovascular disease and related conditions: a literature review.

Authors:  N Muszbek; D Brixner; A Benedict; A Keskinaslan; Z M Khan
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  The Association between KIF6 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism rs20455 and Serum Lipids in Filipino-American Women.

Authors:  Irma B Ancheta; Cynthia A Battie; Dan Richard; Christine V Ancheta; Nancy Borja-Hart; Annabelle S Volgman; Yvette Conley
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2014-01-23

8.  The efficacy of 'static' training interventions for improving indices of cardiorespiratory fitness in premenopausal females.

Authors:  P J J Herrod; J E M Blackwell; B F Moss; A Gates; P J Atherton; J N Lund; J P Williams; B E Phillips
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.078

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.