Literature DB >> 15692986

A randomized, double-blind clinical trial of two doses of meloxicam compared with naproxen in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: short- and long-term efficacy and safety results.

Nicolino Ruperto1, Irina Nikishina, Evgueni D Pachanov, Ynessa Shachbazian, Anne Marie Prieur, Richard Mouy, Rik Joos, Francesco Zulian, Rudolf Schwarz, Valeria Artamonova, Wolfgang Emminger, Marcia Bandeira, Antonella Buoncompagni, Ivan Foeldvari, Fernanda Falcini, Eileen Baildam, Isabelle Kone-Paut, Maria Alessio, Valeria Gerloni, Alessandro Lenhardt, Alberto Martini, Gertraud Hanft, Ralf Sigmund, Stefan Simianer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In an international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial we evaluated the short-term (3 months) and long-term (12 months) efficacy and safety of 2 different doses of meloxicam oral suspension compared with the efficacy and safety of naproxen oral suspension in children with oligoarticular-course (oligo-course) or polyarticular-course (poly-course) juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).
METHODS: Children ages 2-16 years who had active oligo-course or poly-course JIA and who required therapy with a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug were eligible for this trial. Patients were randomly allocated to receive therapy with meloxicam oral suspension, 0.125 mg/kg body weight in a single daily dose; meloxicam oral suspension, 0.25 mg/kg body weight in a single daily dose; or naproxen, 10 mg/kg body weight in 2 daily doses. The trial drugs were administered in a double-blind, double-dummy design for up to 12 months. Response rates were determined according to the American College of Rheumatology pediatric 30% improvement criteria (ACR pediatric 30). Safety parameters were assessed by evaluating the frequency of adverse events in the 3 groups.
RESULTS: Of 232 patients enrolled, 225 received treatment, 6 were not eligible for randomization, and 1 randomized patient was not treated. One hundred eighty-two patients (81%) completed the 12-month treatment period. Response rates according to the ACR pediatric 30 criteria improved from month 3 to month 12, as follows: from 63% to 77% in the meloxicam 0.125 mg/kg group, from 58% to 76% in the meloxicam 0.25 mg/kg group, and from 64% to 74% in the naproxen group. No statistically significant differences in response rates were observed between the groups. There were no differences in the frequency of adverse events or abnormal laboratory values between the 3 groups.
CONCLUSION: The short- and long-term safety and efficacy of meloxicam oral suspension appear to be comparable with the safety and efficacy of naproxen oral suspension in the treatment of oligo-course and poly-course JIA. The once-daily administration of meloxicam oral suspension might represent an improvement in the treatment of JIA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15692986     DOI: 10.1002/art.20860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  18 in total

Review 1.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Christopher Eccleston; Tess E Cooper; Emma Fisher; Brian Anderson; Nick Mr Wilkinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 2.  Update on the medical treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Philip J Hashkes; Ronald M Laxer
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of etoricoxib in the treatment of hemophilic arthropathy.

Authors:  Christos Tsoukas; M Elaine Eyster; Sumiko Shingo; Saurabh Mukhopadhyay; Karen M Giallella; Sean P Curtis; Alise S Reicin; Agustin Melian
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Assessment and management of pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Jennifer E Weiss; Nadia J C Luca; Alexis Boneparth; Jennifer Stinson
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 5.  2011 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: initiation and safety monitoring of therapeutic agents for the treatment of arthritis and systemic features.

Authors:  Timothy Beukelman; Nivedita M Patkar; Kenneth G Saag; Sue Tolleson-Rinehart; Randy Q Cron; Esi Morgan DeWitt; Norman T Ilowite; Yukiko Kimura; Ronald M Laxer; Daniel J Lovell; Alberto Martini; C Egla Rabinovich; Nicolino Ruperto
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 6.  [Juvenile arthritides].

Authors:  G Horneff
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Improvement of functional ability in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis by treatment with etanercept.

Authors:  M Halbig; G Horneff
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A survey of practices and concerns of pediatric medical and surgical specialists and a summary of available safety data.

Authors:  Deborah M Levy; Lisa F Imundo
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.054

Review 9.  Update on the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Julia G Harris; Elizabeth A Kessler; James W Verbsky
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 10.  Pharmacological treatment of chronic non-cancer pain in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Eapen Mathew; Eugene Kim; Kenneth R Goldschneider
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.