Literature DB >> 15692852

Response of biofilm bacteria to dissolved organic matter from decomposing maple leaves.

C J McNamara1, L G Leff.   

Abstract

Stream bacteria play an important role in the utilization of dissolved organic matter (DOM) leached from leaves, and in transfer of this DOM to other trophic levels. Leaf leachate is a mixture of labile, recalcitrant, and inhibitory compounds, and bacterial communities vary in their ability to utilize leachate. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of DOM from sugar maple leaves on bacterial populations in biofilms on decomposing leaf surfaces. Populations of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Burkholderia cepacia, and Pseudomonas putida were enumerated on decomposing maple leaves in a northeast Ohio stream using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Additionally, artificial substrata consisting of PVC-end caps filled with agar supplemented with leaf leachate and covered with cellulose filters were used to determine bacterial response to leachate from leaves at different stages of decomposition. Population sizes of bacterial species exhibited different responses. Leachate did not affect A. calcoaceticus. B. cepacia was tolerant of phenolic compounds released from leaves and the population size increased when DOM concentrations were greatest. In contrast, P. putida was inhibited by phenolic components of leachate when total DOM concentrations were greatest. Differences in response of the bacterial species to components of leaf leachate indicate the complexity of microbial population dynamics and interactions with DOM. Differences among species in response to DOM have the potential to influence transport and retention of organic matter in stream ecosystems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15692852     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-003-1058-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  9 in total

1.  Response of bacteria isolated from a pristine prairie stream to concentration and source of soluble organic carbon.

Authors:  J V McArthur; G R Marzolf; J E Urban
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The microbial loop in flowing waters.

Authors:  J L Meyer
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Use of a simplified cell blot technique and 16S rRNA-directed probes for identification of common environmental isolates.

Authors:  E B Braun-Howland; P A Vescio; S A Nierzwicki-Bauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The Response of Three Bacterial Populations to Pollution in a Stream

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Bacterial Populations in an Anthropogenically Disturbed Stream: Comparison of Different Seasons.

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 6.  Genetics and physiology of Acinetobacter.

Authors:  E Juni
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 15.500

7.  The aerobic pseudomonads: a taxonomic study.

Authors:  R Y Stanier; N J Palleroni; M Doudoroff
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1966-05

8.  Temporal changes in the bacterioplankton of a Northeast Ohio (USA) River.

Authors:  J Liu; L G Leff
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Patterns and sources of leaf tannin variation in yellow birch (Betula allegheniensis) and sugar maple (Acer saccharum).

Authors:  I T Baldwin; J C Schultz; D Ward
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.626

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Abundance of three bacterial populations in selected streams.

Authors:  O A Olapade; X Gao; L G Leff
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Water-sediment exchanges control microbial processes associated with leaf litter degradation in the hyporheic zone: a microcosm study.

Authors:  Simon Navel; Florian Mermillod-Blondin; Bernard Montuelle; Eric Chauvet; Laurent Simon; Pierre Marmonier
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Seasonal response of stream biofilm communities to dissolved organic matter and nutrient enrichments.

Authors:  Ola A Olapade; Laura G Leff
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Microbial Biofilm Community Variation in Flowing Habitats: Potential Utility as Bioindicators of Postmortem Submersion Intervals.

Authors:  Jennifer M Lang; Racheal Erb; Jennifer L Pechal; John R Wallace; Ryan W McEwan; Mark Eric Benbow
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2016-01-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.