Literature DB >> 15692751

A comparison of record linkage yield for health research using different variable sets.

Michael S Simon1, Beth A Mueller, Dennis Deapen, Glenn Copeland.   

Abstract

As part of a study on childbearing and survival, we linked records of young women with invasive breast cancer identified through three population-based cancer registries, to state birth certificate records. In Michigan prior to 1989, only maternal social security number (SSN) was available for matching; other data became available in 1989 including name, birth date, address, and infant's surname. To examine the quality of the linkage using SSN as the sole matching criterion, we conducted two procedures using data for 1989-1994 to compare linkages identified by SSN, to linkages identified using other available variables. Linkage was conducted using a deterministic approach based on seven variables and 14 steps. In each step a string of relevant variables was created and in successive phases selected variables were substituted or removed with decreasingly stringent requirements. A manual review was done to check for accuracy. Utilizing all available variables, the linkage process yielded 793 matches (live births) among 4496 patients, 780 [98%] of which would have been identified using SSN alone. Five of seven matches identified by SSN were not confirmed by manual review. SSN appears to be fairly accurate for linkage and can be valuable for linking cancer registries to other data sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15692751     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-004-1475-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  5 in total

1.  The false security of blind dates: chrononymization's lack of impact on data privacy of laboratory data.

Authors:  J J Cimino
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  A population-based case-control study of fetal growth, gestational age, and maternal breast cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Nechuta; Nigel Paneth; Dorothy R Pathak; Joseph Gardiner; Glenn Copeland; Ellen M Velie
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Pregnancy outcomes in female childhood and adolescent cancer survivors: a linked cancer-birth registry analysis.

Authors:  Beth A Mueller; Eric J Chow; Aruna Kamineni; Janet R Daling; Alison Fraser; Charles L Wiggins; Geraldine P Mineau; Merlin R Hamre; Richard K Severson; Carolyn Drews-Botsch
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2009-10

4.  Validation of de-identified record linkage to ascertain hospital admissions in a cohort study.

Authors:  Alison Beauchamp; Andrew M Tonkin; Helen Kelsall; Vijaya Sundararajan; Dallas R English; Lalitha Sundaresan; Rory Wolfe; Gavin Turrell; Graham G Giles; Anna Peeters
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  The Forteo Patient Registry linkage to multiple state cancer registries: study design and results from the first 8 years.

Authors:  A Gilsenan; A Harding; N Kellier-Steele; D Harris; K Midkiff; E Andrews
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.507

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.