Literature DB >> 15692354

Dynamic versus static splinting of simple zone V and zone VI extensor tendon repairs: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Arian Mowlavi1, Mary Burns, Richard E Brown.   

Abstract

The authors present the first prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing postoperative dynamic versus static splinting outcomes of patients following extensor tendon repair. Patients who incurred simple and complete lacerations of their extensor tendons in zones V and VI were enrolled into the study and underwent either static splinting (n = 17) or dynamic splinting (n = 17) following primary acute repair of tendons. Total active motion was improved in the dynamic group when compared with the static group in the injured digits at 4 weeks (180.5 +/- 4 degrees versus 131.3 +/- 61 degrees; p = 0.006), at 6 weeks (239 +/- 21.9 degrees versus 205.5 +/- 53.4 degrees; p = 0.048), and at 8 weeks (247+/- 19.8 degrees versus 216.3 +/- 36 degrees; p = 0.051), but not at 6 months (253.1 +/-18.8 degrees versus 250.5 +/- 32 degrees; p = 0.562). Similarly, total active motion averaged for all digits (injured and noninjured) of the involved hand was improved in the dynamic group over the static group at 4 weeks (209.8 +/- 31.3 degrees versus 140 +/- 58.2 degrees; p < 0.001) and at 6 weeks (241.5 +/- 17.2 degrees versus 217.1 +/- 42.4 degrees; p = 0.024), but not at 8 weeks (249.6 +/- 16 degrees versus 234.8 +/- 24.5 degrees; p = 0.215) or 6 months (252.3 +/- 14 degrees versus 249.1 +/- 31 degrees; p = 0.450). Grip strength outcomes demonstrated improved grip force for the dynamic group when compared with the static group at 8 weeks (81.3 +/- 18.0 percent versus 59.2 +/- 20.4 percent; p = 0.004) but not at 6 months (89.6 +/- 5.6 percent versus 82.1 +/- 22.0 percent; p = 0.595). Patients demonstrated forceful grip greater than or equal to 80 percent of the noninjured hand in 55 percent of patients in the dynamic group versus 15 percent of patients in the static group at 8 weeks. Patients demonstrated forceful grip greater than or equal to 80 percent of the noninjured hand in 100 percent of patients in the dynamic group versus 73 percent of patients in the static group at 6 months. The authors' findings suggest that dynamic splinting of simple, complete lacerations of the extensor tendons in zones V and VI provides improved functional outcomes at 4, 6, and 8 weeks but not by 6 months when compared with static splinting. Therefore, they recommend dynamic splinting of simple, complete extensor tendon lacerations in zones V and VI only to select patients who are motivated and desire earlier return to full functional capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15692354     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000149479.96088.5d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  The optimal orthosis and motion protocol for extensor tendon injury in zones IV-VIII: A systematic review.

Authors:  Alison L Wong; Madeline Wilson; Sakina Girnary; Matthew Nojoomi; Soumyadipta Acharya; Scott M Paul
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Rehabilitation regimens following surgical repair of extensor tendon injuries of the hand-a systematic review of controlled trials.

Authors:  Chye Yew Ng; Joelle Chalmer; Duncan J M Macdonald; Saurabh S Mehta; David Nuttall; Adam C Watts
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2012-09-15

3.  Complications of extensor tendon repairs at the extensor retinaculum.

Authors:  Shrikant J Chinchalkar; Joey G Pipicelli
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2010-08-11

4.  Management of extensor tendon injuries.

Authors:  M Griffin; S Hindocha; D Jordan; M Saleh; W Khan
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-02-23

5.  Early active mobilisation versus immobilisation after extrinsic extensor tendon repair: A prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  R K Patil; A R Koul
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2012-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.