BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most lethal stroke types. In December 2003, a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) workshop was convened to develop a consensus for ICH research priorities. The focus was clinical research aimed at acute ICH in patients. METHODS: Workshop participants were divided into 6 groups: (1) current state of ICH research; (2) basic science; and (3) imaging, (4) medical, (5) surgical, and (6) clinical methodology. Each group formulated research priorities before the workshop. At the workshop, these were discussed and refined. RESULTS: Recent progress in management of hemorrhage growth, intraventricular hemorrhage, and limitations in the benefit of open craniotomy were noted. The workshop identified the importance of developing animal models to reflect human ICH, as well as the phenomena of rebleeding. More human ICH pathology is needed. Real-time, high-field magnets and 3-dimensional imaging, as well as high-resolution tissue probes, are ICH imaging priorities. Trials of acute blood pressure-lowering in ICH and coagulopathy reversal are medical priorities. The exact role of edema in human ICH pathology and its treatment requires intensive study. Trials of minimally invasive surgical techniques including mechanical and chemical surgical adjuncts are critically important. The methodologic challenges include establishing research networks and a multi-specialty approach. Waiver of consent issues and standardizing care in trials are important issues. Encouragement of young investigators from varied backgrounds to enter the ICH research field is critical. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing ICH research is crucial. A collaborative approach is likely to yield therapies for this devastating form of brain injury.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most lethal stroke types. In December 2003, a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) workshop was convened to develop a consensus for ICH research priorities. The focus was clinical research aimed at acute ICH in patients. METHODS: Workshop participants were divided into 6 groups: (1) current state of ICH research; (2) basic science; and (3) imaging, (4) medical, (5) surgical, and (6) clinical methodology. Each group formulated research priorities before the workshop. At the workshop, these were discussed and refined. RESULTS: Recent progress in management of hemorrhage growth, intraventricular hemorrhage, and limitations in the benefit of open craniotomy were noted. The workshop identified the importance of developing animal models to reflect humanICH, as well as the phenomena of rebleeding. More humanICH pathology is needed. Real-time, high-field magnets and 3-dimensional imaging, as well as high-resolution tissue probes, are ICH imaging priorities. Trials of acute blood pressure-lowering in ICH and coagulopathy reversal are medical priorities. The exact role of edema in humanICH pathology and its treatment requires intensive study. Trials of minimally invasive surgical techniques including mechanical and chemical surgical adjuncts are critically important. The methodologic challenges include establishing research networks and a multi-specialty approach. Waiver of consent issues and standardizing care in trials are important issues. Encouragement of young investigators from varied backgrounds to enter the ICH research field is critical. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing ICH research is crucial. A collaborative approach is likely to yield therapies for this devastating form of brain injury.
Authors: R I Aviv; T Huynh; Y Huang; D Ramsay; P Van Slyke; D Dumont; P Asmah; R Alkins; R Liu; K Hynynen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Tim Lekic; Robert P Ostrowski; Hidenori Suzuki; Anatol Manaenko; William Rolland; Nancy Fathali; Jiping Tang; John H Zhang Journal: Acta Neurochir Suppl Date: 2011
Authors: Opeolu Adeoye; Joseph F Clark; Pooja Khatri; Kenneth R Wagner; Mario Zuccarello; Gail J Pyne-Geithman Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 6.829