Literature DB >> 15691997

Stroke units: research and reality. Results from the National Sentinel Audit of Stroke.

A G Rudd1, A Hoffman, P Irwin, M Pearson, D Lowe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To use data from the 2001-2 National Stroke Audit to describe the organisation of stroke units in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and to see if key characteristics deemed effective from the research literature were present.
DESIGN: Data were collected as part of the National Sentinel Audit of Stroke in 2001, both on the organisation and structure of inpatient stroke care and the process of care to hospitals managing stroke patients.
SETTING: 240 hospitals from England, Wales and Northern Ireland took part in the 2001-2 National Stroke Audit, a response rate of over 95%. These sites audited a total of 8200 patients. AUDIT TOOL: Royal College of Physicians Intercollegiate Working Party Stroke Audit Tool.
RESULTS: 73% of hospitals participating in the audit had a stroke unit but only 36% of stroke admissions spent any time on one. Only 46% of all units describing themselves as stroke units had all five organisational characteristics that previous research literature had identified as being key features, while 26% had four and 28% had three or less. Better organisation was associated with better process of care for patients, with patients managed on stroke units receiving better care than those managed in other settings.
CONCLUSION: The National Service Framework for Older People set a target for all hospitals treating stroke patients to have a stroke unit by April 2004. This study suggests that in many hospitals this is being achieved without adequate resource and expertise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15691997      PMCID: PMC1743957          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  7 in total

1.  Stroke units: the next 10 years.

Authors:  Peter Langhorne; Martin S Dennis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Reliability and validity of the Intercollegiate Stroke Audit Package.

Authors:  P H Gompertz; P Irwin; R Morris; D Lowe; Z Rutledge; A G Rudd; M G Pearson
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Stroke units in their natural habitat: can results of randomized trials be reproduced in routine clinical practice? Riks-Stroke Collaboration.

Authors:  B Stegmayr; K Asplund; K Hulter-Asberg; B Norrving; M Peltonen; A Terént; P O Wester
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Differences in long-term outcome between patients treated in stroke units and in general wards: a 2-year follow-up of stroke patients in sweden.

Authors:  E L Glader; B Stegmayr; L Johansson; K Hulter-Asberg; P O Wester
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  National stroke audit: a tool for change?

Authors:  A G Rudd; D Lowe; P Irwin; Z Rutledge; M Pearson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

6.  Stroke units and stroke services in Germany.

Authors:  Otto Busse
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.762

7.  The French stroke program.

Authors:  Marc Hommel; Alain Deblasi; Katia Garambois; Assia Jaillard
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.762

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Secondary prevention of falls and osteoporotic fractures in older people.

Authors:  David Oliver; Marion E T McMurdo; Sanjeev Patel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-16

2.  UK National COPD Audit 2003: Impact of hospital resources and organisation of care on patient outcome following admission for acute COPD exacerbation.

Authors:  L C Price; D Lowe; H S R Hosker; K Anstey; M G Pearson; C M Roberts
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Patient engagement with research: European population register study.

Authors:  Christopher McKevitt; Nina Fudge; Siobhan Crichton; Yannick Bejot; Benoît Daubail; Antonio Di Carlo; Patricia Fearon; Peter Kolominsky-Rabas; Anita Sheldenkar; Sophie Newbound; Charles D A Wolfe
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Increasing delivery of an outdoor journey intervention to people with stroke: A feasibility study involving five community rehabilitation teams.

Authors:  Annie McCluskey; Sandy Middleton
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Evaluation of stroke services in Anglia Stroke Clinical Network to examine the variation in acute services and stroke outcomes.

Authors:  Phyo K Myint; John F Potter; Gill M Price; Garry R Barton; Anthony K Metcalf; Rachel Hale; Genevieve Dalton; Stanley D Musgrave; Abraham George; Raj Shekhar; Peter Owusu-Agyei; Kevin Walsh; Joseph Ngeh; Anne Nicholson; Diana J Day; Elizabeth A Warburton; Max O Bachmann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  National Audit of Seizure management in Hospitals (NASH): results of the national audit of adult epilepsy in the UK.

Authors:  Peter A Dixon; Jamie J Kirkham; Anthony G Marson; Mike G Pearson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Managing acute ischaemic stroke in a small island developing state: meeting the guidelines in Barbados.

Authors:  Asanchia S Harewood-Marshall; Leslie S Craig; Tanya P Martelly; David O C Corbin; Lauren Maul; Damani McIntosh-Clarke; Tracey Blackman; Kenneth S George; Anselm J M Hennis; Ian R Hambleton; Angela M C Rose
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Implementing a training intervention to support caregivers after stroke: a process evaluation examining the initiation and embedding of programme change.

Authors:  David James Clarke; Mary Godfrey; Rebecca Hawkins; Euan Sadler; Geoffrey Harding; Anne Forster; Christopher McKevitt; Josie Dickerson; Amanda Farrin
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 7.327

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.