Literature DB >> 15691597

Second-intention repair in the horse and pony and management of exuberant granulation tissue.

Jacintha M Wilmink1, P René van Weeren.   

Abstract

Second-intention repair is faster in ponies than in horses and faster in body wounds than in limb wounds. To a large extent, the differences between horses and ponies can be explained by differences in the local inflammatory response, which are a result of the functional capacity of leukocytes. In ponies, leukocytes produce more inflammatory mediators,resulting in better local defense, faster cellular debridement, and a faster transition to the repair phases, with more wound contraction. In horses,leukocytes produce fewer mediators, initiating a weak inflammatory response, which becomes chronic. This inhibits wound contraction and gives rise to the formation of exuberant granulation tissue. The anatomic environment that influences the inflammatory response and wound contraction most probably determines the differences between body and limb wounds. In body wounds, better perfusion results in faster initiation of the inflammatory phase. The weaker local resistance results in a greater degree of contraction. In limb wounds, particularly of horses, the initial inflammatory response is weak and wound contraction is restricted. Both factors give rise to chronic inflammation, which further inhibits wound contraction and promotes exuberant granulation tissue. The high incidence of exuberant granulation tissue in limb wounds of horses can thus be explained by the chronicity of the inflammatory response as well as by the common use of bandages during treatment. Chronic inflammation is often not recognized as a cause of exuberant granulation tissue. It must be prevented and treated to promote the healing process. Bandages and casts stimulate the formation of exuberant granulation tissue; however, they are advantageous in many respects and play an important role in support of the overall healing process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15691597     DOI: 10.1016/j.cveq.2004.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract        ISSN: 0749-0739            Impact factor:   1.792


  5 in total

1.  The effects of topical oxygen therapy on equine distal limb dermal wound healing.

Authors:  Alexandra K Tracey; Cody J Alcott; Jennifer A Schleining; Sina Safayi; Peter C Zaback; Jesse M Hostetter; Eric L Reinertson
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 2.  Filling the vacuum: Role of negative pressure wound therapy in open wound management in cats.

Authors:  Mirja C Nolff
Journal:  J Feline Med Surg       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.015

3.  Comparison of incisional complications between skin closures using a simple continuous or intradermal pattern: a pilot study in horses undergoing ventral median celiotomy.

Authors:  Doreen Scharner; Claudia Gittel; Karsten Winter; Dominique Blaue; Carola Schedlbauer; Ingrid Vervuert; Walter Brehm
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 4.  Biomaterials-Driven Sterile Inflammation.

Authors:  Henry Chen; Devendra K Agrawal; Finosh G Thankam
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  Effect of Allogeneic Oral Mucosa Mesenchymal Stromal Cells on Equine Wound Repair.

Authors:  Paola Di Francesco; Pauline Cajon; Christophe Desterke; Marie-France Perron Lepage; Jean-Jacques Lataillade; Tewfik Kadri; Olivier M Lepage
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2021-12-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.