PURPOSE: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements before and after LASIK. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty participants undergoing LASIK and 14 normal controls. METHODS: Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness was measured before LASIK and approximately 3 months after surgery in one eye each of 20 patients using a scanning laser polarimeter (GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer) with fixed corneal compensation (FCC), one with variable corneal compensation (GDx VCC), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Fourteen normal controls also were tested at baseline and approximately 3 months later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses measured with the GDx FCC, GDx VCC, and OCT. RESULTS: At baseline, mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) RNFL thicknesses for the GDx FCC, GDx VCC, and OCT were 78.1 microm (72.2-83.9), 54.3 microm (52.7-56.0), and 96.8 microm (93.2-100.5), respectively. In both LASIK and control groups, there were no significant changes between baseline and follow-up examinations in GDx VCC and OCT RNFL thickness measurements globally or in the superior and inferior quadrants (mean change, <5 microm for each instrument). In the control group, there also was no significant change in GDx FCC measurements between baseline and follow-up. In LASIK patients, significant reductions were observed in GDx FCC RNFL measurements. Average absolute values of the mean (95% CI) change in thickness were 12.4 microm (7.7-17.2), 15.3 microm (9.6-20.9), and 12.9 microm (7.6-18.1) for GDx FCC RNFL measurements superiorly, inferiorly, and globally, respectively (all Ps < or = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LASIK does not seem to change RNFL thickness. Reduction in GDx FCC RNFL thickness measurements after LASIK is a measurement artifact and is most likely due to erroneous compensation for corneal birefringence. With scanning laser polarimetry, it is mandatory to compensate individually for change in corneal birefringence after LASIK to ensure accurate RNFL assessment.
PURPOSE: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements before and after LASIK. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty participants undergoing LASIK and 14 normal controls. METHODS: Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness was measured before LASIK and approximately 3 months after surgery in one eye each of 20 patients using a scanning laser polarimeter (GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer) with fixed corneal compensation (FCC), one with variable corneal compensation (GDx VCC), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Fourteen normal controls also were tested at baseline and approximately 3 months later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses measured with the GDx FCC, GDx VCC, and OCT. RESULTS: At baseline, mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) RNFL thicknesses for the GDx FCC, GDx VCC, and OCT were 78.1 microm (72.2-83.9), 54.3 microm (52.7-56.0), and 96.8 microm (93.2-100.5), respectively. In both LASIK and control groups, there were no significant changes between baseline and follow-up examinations in GDx VCC and OCT RNFL thickness measurements globally or in the superior and inferior quadrants (mean change, <5 microm for each instrument). In the control group, there also was no significant change in GDx FCC measurements between baseline and follow-up. In LASIK patients, significant reductions were observed in GDx FCC RNFL measurements. Average absolute values of the mean (95% CI) change in thickness were 12.4 microm (7.7-17.2), 15.3 microm (9.6-20.9), and 12.9 microm (7.6-18.1) for GDx FCC RNFL measurements superiorly, inferiorly, and globally, respectively (all Ps < or = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LASIK does not seem to change RNFL thickness. Reduction in GDx FCC RNFL thickness measurements after LASIK is a measurement artifact and is most likely due to erroneous compensation for corneal birefringence. With scanning laser polarimetry, it is mandatory to compensate individually for change in corneal birefringence after LASIK to ensure accurate RNFL assessment.
Authors: Shan C Lin; Kuldev Singh; Henry D Jampel; Elizabeth A Hodapp; Scott D Smith; Brian A Francis; David K Dueker; Robert D Fechtner; John S Samples; Joel S Schuman; Don S Minckler Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Tarkan Mumcuoglu; Kelly A Townsend; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Richard A Bilonick; Kyung Rim Sung; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-07-26 Impact factor: 5.258