Andreas Braun1, Felix Krause, Matthias Frentzen, Søren Jepsen. 1. Department of Periodontology, Operative and Preventive Dentistry, University of Bonn, Welschnonnenstrasse 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany. andreas.braun@uni-bonn.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the removal of root substance with the Vector-system depending on different irrigation fluids and to compare the results with conventional methods for root debridement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty extracted human teeth were treated using four different methods: Vector-system with polishing fluid and metal curette (VP), Vector-system with abrasive fluid and metal curette (VA), conventional ultrasonic system (U) with insert tip "P" and hand instrument. Treatment of the calculus-free root surfaces was carried out for a total of 12 min. using an artificial periodontal pocket. At intervals of 120 s, the removal of dental hard tissues was assessed using a three-dimensional (3D) laser scanning device and the Match 3D software with an accuracy of 0.00001 mm(3). RESULTS: No difference in the removal of root substance with the hand instrument (0.0055 mm(3)/s) and the Vector-system using the abrasive fluid (0.0044 mm(3)/s) could be observed (p=0.51). Using these two systems, a larger amount of root substance (p<0.05) was removed compared with the other methods (U: 0.0023 mm(3)/s, VP: 0.0022 mm(3)/s), which did not differ from each other (p=0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that the Vector-system in combination with polishing fluid or conventional ultrasonics might be used for root debridement without extensive root substance removal. (c) Blackwell Munksgaard, 2005.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the removal of root substance with the Vector-system depending on different irrigation fluids and to compare the results with conventional methods for root debridement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty extracted human teeth were treated using four different methods: Vector-system with polishing fluid and metal curette (VP), Vector-system with abrasive fluid and metal curette (VA), conventional ultrasonic system (U) with insert tip "P" and hand instrument. Treatment of the calculus-free root surfaces was carried out for a total of 12 min. using an artificial periodontal pocket. At intervals of 120 s, the removal of dental hard tissues was assessed using a three-dimensional (3D) laser scanning device and the Match 3D software with an accuracy of 0.00001 mm(3). RESULTS: No difference in the removal of root substance with the hand instrument (0.0055 mm(3)/s) and the Vector-system using the abrasive fluid (0.0044 mm(3)/s) could be observed (p=0.51). Using these two systems, a larger amount of root substance (p<0.05) was removed compared with the other methods (U: 0.0023 mm(3)/s, VP: 0.0022 mm(3)/s), which did not differ from each other (p=0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that the Vector-system in combination with polishing fluid or conventional ultrasonics might be used for root debridement without extensive root substance removal. (c) Blackwell Munksgaard, 2005.