Literature DB >> 15691295

Long-term ursodeoxycholic acid therapy for primary biliary cirrhosis: a follow-up to 12 years.

C W Chan1, F Gunsar, M Feudjo, C Rigamonti, J Vlachogiannakos, J R Carpenter, A K Burroughs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether ursodeoxycholic acid therapy slows down the progression of primary biliary cirrhosis, according to two meta-analyses. However, the randomized trials evaluated had only a median of 24 months of follow-up. AIM: To evaluate long-term ursodeoxycholic acid therapy in primary biliary cirrhosis.
METHODS: We evaluated 209 consecutive primary biliary cirrhosis patients, 69 compliant with ursodeoxycholic acid and 140 untreated [mean follow-up 5.79 (s.d. = 4.73) and 4.87 (s.d. = 5.21) years, respectively] with onset of all complications documented. Comparison was made following adjustment for baseline differences according to Cox modelling, Mayo and Royal Free prognostic models.
RESULTS: Bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase concentrations improved with ursodeoxycholic acid (at 36 months, P = 0.007 and 0.018, respectively). Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis showed benefit (P = 0.028), as 44 (31%) untreated and 15 (22%) ursodeoxycholic acid patients died or had liver transplantation. However, there was no difference when adjusted by Cox modelling (P = 0.267), Mayo (P = 0.698) and Royal Free models (P = 0.559). New pruritus or fatigue or other complications were not different, either before or after adjustment for baseline characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term ursodeoxycholic acid therapy did not alter disease progression in primary biliary cirrhosis patients despite a significant improvement in serum bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase consistent with, and similar to, those seen in ursodeoxycholic acid cohorts in randomized trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15691295     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02318.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  4 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for liver cirrhosis 2015.

Authors:  Hiroshi Fukui; Hidetsugu Saito; Yoshiyuki Ueno; Hirofumi Uto; Katsutoshi Obara; Isao Sakaida; Akitaka Shibuya; Masataka Seike; Sumiko Nagoshi; Makoto Segawa; Hirohito Tsubouchi; Hisataka Moriwaki; Akinobu Kato; Etsuko Hashimoto; Kojiro Michitaka; Toshikazu Murawaki; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Treatment of Fatigue in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Lee; Christopher J Danford; Hirsh D Trivedi; Elliot B Tapper; Vilas R Patwardhan; Alan Bonder
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Biochemical criteria at 1 year are not robust indicators of response to ursodeoxycholic acid in early primary biliary cirrhosis: results from a 29-year cohort study.

Authors:  V Papastergiou; E A Tsochatzis; M Rodriguez-Peralvarez; M Rodriquez-Peralvarez; E Thalassinos; G Pieri; P Manousou; G Germani; C Rigamonti; V Arvaniti; S Karatapanis; A K Burroughs
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Clinical significance of changes in the Th17/Treg ratio in autoimmune liver disease.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Feng; Ting Zou; Xin Wang; Wei-Feng Zhao; Ai-Lan Qin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.