Literature DB >> 15691207

Using aggregate root cause analysis to reduce falls.

Peter D Mills1, Julia Neily, Diana Luan, Erik Stalhandske, William B Weeks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In certain categories of adverse events, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities may combine data to produce an aggregate review of the data. Individual root cause analyses are still required for the more serious adverse events. About 100 of the VA acute and long term care facilities contributed data to an analysis of results of 176 root cause analyses (RCAs) for patient falls occurring in the VA system.
METHODS: Success was measured through a decreased report of falls and major injures due to falls after each organization's action plans were implemented. In addition, telephone interviews were conducted to understand success factors as well as barriers to implementation of clinical improvements.
RESULTS: Of the 745 actions generated (that addressed the root cause), 435 (61.4%) had been fully implemented and another 148 (20.9%) had been partially implemented; 34.4% of the facilities reported reducing falls and 38.9% reported reducing major injuries due to falls. DISCUSSION: The action plans associated with these reductions focused on making specific clinical changes at the bedside rather than policy changes or educating staff. Specific interventions most highly associated with reductions in falls and injuries included environmental assessments, toileting interventions, and interventions that directly addressed the root cause and were the responsibility of a single person (as opposed to a group).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15691207     DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(05)31004-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  9 in total

Review 1.  Preventing Falls in Hospitalized Patients: State of the Science.

Authors:  Jennifer H LeLaurin; Ronald I Shorr
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.076

2.  Physician Burnout: Resilience Training is Only Part of the Solution.

Authors:  Alan J Card
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Error and patient safety: ethical analysis of cases in occupational and physical therapy practice.

Authors:  Linda S Scheirton; K Mu; H Lohman; T M Cochran
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-02-20

4.  Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation.

Authors:  Charles Vincent; Jane Carthey; Carl Macrae; Rene Amalberti
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Review of alternatives to root cause analysis: developing a robust system for incident report analysis.

Authors:  Gregory Hagley; Peter D Mills; Bradley V Watts; Albert W Wu
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-08-01

6.  Collaborative Case Review: A Systems-Based Approach to Patient Safety Event Investigation and Analysis.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Ramin Khorasani; Karen Fiumara; Neena Kapoor; Patrick Curley; Giles W Boland; Sunil Eappen
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.243

Review 7.  The problem with Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.

Authors:  Julie E Reed; Alan J Card
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  The problem with root cause analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Farhad Peerally; Susan Carr; Justin Waring; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  Generic analysis method to learn from serious adverse events in Dutch hospitals: a human factors perspective.

Authors:  Mees Casper Baartmans; Steffie Marijke Van Schoten; Cordula Wagner
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2022-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.