Literature DB >> 15690088

5' CArG degeneracy in smooth muscle alpha-actin is required for injury-induced gene suppression in vivo.

Jennifer A Hendrix1, Brian R Wamhoff, Oliver G McDonald, Sanjay Sinha, Tadashi Yoshida, Gary K Owens.   

Abstract

CC(A/T)6GG-dependent (CArG-dependent) and serum response factor-dependent (SRF-dependent) mechanisms are required for gene expression in smooth muscle cells (SMCs). However, an unusual feature of many SMC-selective promoter CArG elements is that they contain a conserved single G or C substitution in their central A/T-rich region, which reduces binding affinity for ubiquitously expressed SRF. We hypothesized that this CArG degeneracy contributes to cell-specific expression of smooth muscle alpha-actin in vivo, since substitution of c-fos consensus CArGs for the degenerate CArGs resulted in relaxed specificity in cultured cells. Surprisingly, our present results show that these substitutions have no effect on smooth muscle-specific transgene expression during normal development and maturation in transgenic mice. However, these substitutions significantly attenuated injury-induced downregulation of the mutant transgene under conditions where SRF expression was increased but expression of myocardin, a smooth muscle-selective SRF coactivator, was decreased. Finally, chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses, together with cell culture studies, suggested that myocardin selectively enhanced SRF binding to degenerate versus consensus CArG elements. Our results indicate that reductions in myocardin expression and the degeneracy of CArG elements within smooth muscle promoters play a key role in phenotypic switching of smooth muscle cells in vivo, as well as in mediating responses of CArG-dependent smooth muscle genes and growth regulatory genes under conditions in which these 2 classes of genes are differentially expressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15690088      PMCID: PMC546420          DOI: 10.1172/JCI22648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  49 in total

1.  Molecular mechanisms of decreased smooth muscle differentiation marker expression after vascular injury.

Authors:  C P Regan; P J Adam; C S Madsen; G K Owens
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Transitions in histone acetylation reveal boundaries of three separately regulated neighboring loci.

Authors:  M D Litt; M Simpson; F Recillas-Targa; M N Prioleau; G Felsenfeld
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Positive- and negative-acting Kruppel-like transcription factors bind a transforming growth factor beta control element required for expression of the smooth muscle cell differentiation marker SM22alpha in vivo.

Authors:  P J Adam; C P Regan; M B Hautmann; G K Owens
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Regulation of smooth muscle alpha-actin expression in vivo is dependent on CArG elements within the 5' and first intron promoter regions.

Authors:  C P Mack; G K Owens
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1999-04-16       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Four isoforms of serum response factor that increase or inhibit smooth-muscle-specific promoter activity.

Authors:  P R Kemp; J C Metcalfe
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Stretch-induced alternative splicing of serum response factor promotes bronchial myogenesis and is defective in lung hypoplasia.

Authors:  Y Yang; S Beqaj; P Kemp; I Ariel; L Schuger
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  BTEB2, a Krüppel-like transcription factor, regulates expression of the SMemb/Nonmuscle myosin heavy chain B (SMemb/NMHC-B) gene.

Authors:  N Watanabe; M Kurabayashi; Y Shimomura; K Kawai-Kowase; Y Hoshino; I Manabe; M Watanabe; M Aikawa; M Kuro-o; T Suzuki; Y Yazaki; R Nagai
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1999-07-23       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Physiological control of smooth muscle-specific gene expression through regulated nuclear translocation of serum response factor.

Authors:  B Camoretti-Mercado; H W Liu; A J Halayko; S M Forsythe; J W Kyle; B Li; Y Fu; J McConville; P Kogut; J E Vieira; N M Patel; M B Hershenson; E Fuchs; S Sinha; J M Miano; M S Parmacek; J K Burkhardt; J Solway
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-09-29       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Substitution of the degenerate smooth muscle (SM) alpha-actin CC(A/T-rich)6GG elements with c-fos serum response elements results in increased basal expression but relaxed SM cell specificity and reduced angiotensin II inducibility.

Authors:  M B Hautmann; C S Madsen; C P Mack; G K Owens
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-04-03       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  MAPKAP kinase 2 phosphorylates serum response factor in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  O Heidenreich; A Neininger; G Schratt; R Zinck; M A Cahill; K Engel; A Kotlyarov; R Kraft; S Kostka; M Gaestel; A Nordheim
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  Molecular regulation of contractile smooth muscle cell phenotype: implications for vascular tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Beamish; Ping He; Kandice Kottke-Marchant; Roger E Marchant
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Purine-rich element binding protein B attenuates the coactivator function of myocardin by a novel molecular mechanism of smooth muscle gene repression.

Authors:  Lauren A Ferris; Andrea T Foote; Shu-Xia Wang; Robert J Kelm
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  NADPH oxidase 4 mediates TGF-β-induced smooth muscle α-actin via p38MAPK and serum response factor.

Authors:  Abel Martin-Garrido; David I Brown; Alicia N Lyle; Anna Dikalova; Bonnie Seidel-Rogol; Bernard Lassègue; Alejandra San Martín; Kathy K Griendling
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 7.376

4.  Myocardin: new therapeutic agent in vascular disease?

Authors:  Xiaochun Long; Joseph M Miano
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.311

5.  Control of SRF binding to CArG box chromatin regulates smooth muscle gene expression in vivo.

Authors:  Oliver G McDonald; Brian R Wamhoff; Mark H Hoofnagle; Gary K Owens
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 6.  Defining smooth muscle cells and smooth muscle injury.

Authors:  William M Mahoney; Stephen M Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Maintenance of radiation-induced intestinal fibrosis: cellular and molecular features.

Authors:  Valérie Haydont; Marie-Catherine Vozenin-Brotons
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  CHIP represses myocardin-induced smooth muscle cell differentiation via ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation.

Authors:  Ping Xie; Yongna Fan; Hua Zhang; Yuan Zhang; Mingpeng She; Dongfeng Gu; Cam Patterson; Huihua Li
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Myocardin is sufficient for a smooth muscle-like contractile phenotype.

Authors:  Xiaochun Long; Robert D Bell; William T Gerthoffer; Berislav V Zlokovic; Joseph M Miano
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 8.311

10.  Characteristics of the CArG-SRF binding context in mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Wenwu Wu; Xia Shen; Shiheng Tao
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.