Literature DB >> 15689741

Universal newborn hearing screening: are we achieving the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) objectives?

James L Connolly1, Jeffrey D Carron, Suzanne D Roark.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a two-stage auditory brainstem response (ABR) Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) protocol at an academic medical center has been achieving the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) recommendations for screening all infants, diagnosing hearing loss (HL) within 3 months, and instituting intervention within 6 months. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective database and chart review in an academic tertiary care hospital.
METHODS: A 5-year retrospective review of all newborns screened at our medical center between 1997 to 2001 was performed. Screening was performed by multiple in-hospital postnatal sequential ABR with follow-up outpatient ABR for failures. The protocol called for each newborn to receive at least two separate ABR in-hospital screenings before discharge if the newborn failed the initial screening. For those newborns with extended hospital courses, additional ABR screening were performed randomly in attempt to decrease referral rates at time of discharge. Overall screening population capture rate, referral rate, and false-positive rate were calculated. In addition, HL risk factors, age at diagnosis of HL, and age of onset of intervention were obtained. Cost per diagnosis of HL was calculated as well.
RESULTS: The total number screened was 17,602. Seventy-eight (0.44%) were diagnosed with HL, with 62 (79%) in the high-risk population. The frequency of HL was 1 per 811 low-risk neonates versus 1 in 75 meeting high-risk criteria. Overall population capture rate was greater than 99%, referral rate 4.1%, and false-positive rate 3.6%. Mean age at diagnosis was 3.9 months, with mean age at intervention 6.1 months. Cost per diagnosis was estimated at US 5,074 dollars.
CONCLUSIONS: Our current UNHS protocol using sequential ABR has been successful in screening virtually all neonates and providing timely intervention. This retrospective review has shown one HL diagnosis for every 811 babies screened without high-risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15689741     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000154724.00787.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  19 in total

1.  Using multi-stimulus auditory steady state response to predict hearing thresholds in high-risk infants.

Authors:  Yi-Fan Chou; Peir-Rong Chen; Szu-Hui Yu; Yu-Hsuan Wen; Hung-Pin Wu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Universal Hearing Screening in Newborns Using Otoacoustic Emissions and Brainstem Evoked Response in Eastern Uttar Pradesh.

Authors:  Ashwini Kumar; S C Gupta; V R Sinha
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-02-03

Review 3.  [Newborn hearing impairment. Epidemiology and therapeutic relevance].

Authors:  G Reuter; C Krauth; T Lenarz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Long-Term Otitis Media Outcomes in Infants With Early Tympanostomy Tubes.

Authors:  Kimberly Luu; James Park; Amber D Shaffer; David H Chi
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Hearing screening in a tertiary care hospital in India.

Authors:  Amit Kumar; Neha Shah; Kalpesh B Patel; Rajesh Vishwakarma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-03-01

6.  Prevalence of prelingual deafness in Italy.

Authors:  L Bubbico; A Rosano; A Spagnolo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Analysis methods for measuring passive auditory fNIRS responses generated by a block-design paradigm.

Authors:  Robert Luke; Eric Larson; Maureen J Shader; Hamish Innes-Brown; Lindsey Van Yper; Adrian K C Lee; Paul F Sowman; David McAlpine
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.593

8.  Speech perception benefits of internet versus conventional telephony for hearing-impaired individuals.

Authors:  Georgios Mantokoudis; Patrick Dubach; Flurin Pfiffner; Martin Kompis; Marco Caversaccio; Pascal Senn
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Health economic analysis of screening.

Authors:  Christian Krauth
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10-07

10.  Universal neonatal hearing screening: Six years of experience in Qatar.

Authors:  K Abdul Hadi; A Salahaldin; A Al Qahtani; Z Al Musleh; M Al Sulaitin; A Bener; P Chandra; F Alawi
Journal:  Qatar Med J       Date:  2013-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.