Literature DB >> 15689635

Diabetic Retinopathy Analysis.

R Sivakumar, G Ravindran, M Muthayya, S Lakshminarayanan, C U Velmurughendran.   

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy is one of the common complications of diabetes. Unfortunately, in many cases the patient is not aware of any symptoms until it is too late for effective treatment. Through analysis of evoked potential response of the retina, the optical nerve, and the optical brain center, a way will be paved for early diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy and prognosis during the treatment process. In this paper, we present an artificial-neural-network-based method to classify diabetic retinopathy subjects according to changes in visual evoked potential spectral components and an anatomically realistic computer model of the human eye under normal and retinopathy conditions in a virtual environment using 3D Max Studio and Windows Movie Maker.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 15689635      PMCID: PMC1138264          DOI: 10.1155/JBB.2005.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol        ISSN: 1110-7243


INTRODUCTION

retinopathy is a common cause of visual loss in the world and it is a potentially blinding complication of diabetes that damages the eye's retina [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) may be the most rapidly growing chronic disease in the world. Its long-term complications, including retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, and accelerated macrovascular disease, cause major morbidity and mortality [14, 15, 16, 17]. At first, you may notice no changes in your vision. But do not let diabetic retinopathy fool you. It could get worse over the years and threaten your good vision. Diabetic retinopathy is a complication of diabetes that affects the blood vessels of the retina [18]. Growth of new blood vessels, known as proliferative retinopathy, may lead to blindness through hemorrhage and scarring. A deterioration of retinal blood vessels causing loss of blood vessels and leakage into the retina is known as maculopathy and leads to visual impairment and may progress to blindness. Electrophysiological tests reveal an abnormal function of the visual system in patients with diabetic retinopathy [19]. Visual evoked potential (VEP) has been used in the clinical environment as a diagnostic tool for a long time [20, 21, 22]. VEP is one of the noninvasive tools in analyzing diabetic retinopathy [23, 24, 25]. So far not much of the work has been taken up to identify the effect of retinopathy on optical response and variation in the functioning of the optic nerve [26]. Through analysis of evoked potential response of the optical nerve and optical brain center a way will be paved for early diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy and prognosis during the treatment process [27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34]. In general, the clinical use of VEP is based on the peak amplitude and the latencies of the N75, P100, and N145 [22, 35, 36, 37]. The amplitude and the latencies of these peaks are measured directly from the signal [38, 39]. This requires precise definition of the starting and the end points. Latency measure depends on the point at which the latency is calculated and usually irregular peaks occur due to background EEG, so that averaging and interpolation are required. Therefore the diagnosis based on amplitude and latency in time domain is not alone sufficient. Hence other components should also be taken into consideration. In recent years, many researchers have described a variety of approaches to extract the evoked potentials from the background ongoing EEG [40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47]. The investigation of the frequency domain characteristics of VEP is an attractive analytic approach because it allows detection of subtle waveform abnormalities that may escape detection with normal latency measurements [48, 49, 50]. The spectral analysis of VEP can yield useful information when it is performed carefully [51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60]. Classification of the severity of diabetic retinopathy and quantification of diabetic changes are vital for assessing the therapies and risk factors for this frequent complication of diabetes. Current clinical studies use the standardized, validated Wisconsin grading system of retinopathy, which is performed by an experienced ophthalmologist or grader using standard photographs. This method is a time-consuming process which requires significant training and exercise and is vulnerable to observer error [61, 62, 63]. The artificial neural network (ANN) has been used in a number of different ways in medicine and medically related fields [64, 65, 66, 67, 68]. The principle advantages of ANNs are that they are able to generalize, adapting to signal distortion and noise without loss of robustness, and that they are trained by example and do not require precise description of patterns to be classified or criteria for classification [62, 69, 70]. Computer simulation is well established as a powerful and effective way of modeling health care systems [63, 70, 71]. In our analysis, we first present a method to classify diabetic retinopathy subjects according to changes in VEP spectral components using feedforward ANN. Second we present an anatomically realistic computer model of the human eye under normal and retinopathy conditions in a virtual environment using 3D Max Studio and Windows Movie Maker.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

Experiments were carried out with 50 normal and 300 abnormal subjects (135 females and 165 males in the age group of 39–65 years). The subjects were obtained from the diabetic department with duration of diabetics and type of diabetics, that is, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and NIDDM. Only NIDDM patients were taken to further analysis. After papillary dilation the subjects were screened in the ophthalmology department with both direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy, further vision test, and refraction test, and intraocular pressure was measured. High intraocular pressure subjects were eliminated from further analysis. The NIDDM subjects were divided based on ophthalmoscope results into 4 groups: first group is control (normal) and the other 3 groups have diabetic retinopathy—second group, background diabetic retinopathy (BDR), third group, preproliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and fourth group, proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PPDR).

VEP recordings

All the VEP recordings were performed in a specially equipped electrodiagnostic procedure room in the neurology department (darkened, sound-attenuated room). At the beginning, the patient is seated comfortably approximately 1 meter away from the pattern-shift screen and the viewing distance adjusted based on the subject's visual acuity. The visual stimuli were checkerboard patterns (contrast 70%, mean luminance 110 cd/m2) generated on a TV monitor and reversed in contrast at the rate of two reversals per second. At the viewing distance of 114 cm the check edges subtended 15 minutes of visual angle and the screen of the monitor subtended 12.5°. The refraction of all subjects was corrected for the viewing distance. The stimulation was monocular, with occlusion of the contralateral eye. Standard silver-silver chloride disc surface electrodes were fixed in the following positions: active electrode at Oz, reference electrode at Fpz, ground on the left ear (according to the international 10/20 electrode system). The interelectrode resistance was kept below 3 kΩ. The bioelectric signal was amplified (gain 20 000), filtered (bandpass, 1–100 Hz), and averaged (200 events free from artifacts were averaged for every trial) with sweep speed 50 ms/div and sensitivity 2 μv/div using Nicolet Viking IV NT machine. The analysis time was 500-millisecond intervals following a stimulus.

VEP data analysis

The recorded averaged VEP data appears as a waveform with characteristics points N75, P100, and N135 shown in Figure 1 with potential on the vertical axis (Y component) and time on the horizontal axis (X component). The analogue signal was digitized at a sampling rate of 1024 samples/s. Using Welch's averaged periodogram method the spectral components of the sampled data were identified using MATLAB signal processing toolbox functions with 95% confidence level.
Figure 1

Normal subject VEP waveform.

Feature extraction and classification

First, two dominant peaks' amplitude and corresponding frequency values in the spectrum were extracted. Correlation between the spectral components and diabetic retinopathy stages was identified. These VEP features are classified by feedforward neural network into normal, BDR, PPDR, and PDR categories.

Neural network configuration

We implemented the three-layer feedforward back-propagation neural networks, that is, one input layer, one hidden layer, and one output layer. The ANN had 6 input nodes, 4 hidden nodes, and 4 output nodes. The four output nodes corresponded to normal waveform, BDR waveform, PPDR waveform, and PDR waveform. The neural network output vector is based on the VEP spectral components (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Feedforward neural network.

Neural network training

The neural networks were trained by backpropagation algorithm. Gradient descent (GDM) was used to minimize the mean squared error between network output and the actual error rate. During the training period we utilized 6 input nodes, 6 hidden nodes, and 4 output nodes, logsin transfer function, GDM training method, 6000 epochs, 0.9 learning rate, 0.0001 goal. The training error continues to decrease as the number of epochs increases. Repeated experiments were performed to determine the size of the hidden layer and training sample. Our final ANN consists of 4 hidden units, which provide a compromise between the mapping error and the computational time. Weights were initialized to random values and networks were run until at least one of the following termination conditions was satisfied: maximum epoch, minimum gradient, performance goal.

Neural network testing

For testing, the input data was presented to the ANN without weight adjustment. The output of the ANN was compared with the clinician's classification based on the retinal blood vessel examination and VEP averaging latency methods. Results were compared, and the percent of input patterns, which was correctly classified, was calculated.

RESULTS

VEP spectral components interpretation

The spectral response results show that the peak response occurs at specific frequencies like 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 Hz. The first two spectral components with considerable amplitude were extracted from the power spectrum plot. The important finding of this result shows that there are distinct differences at the peak frequencies for normal and diabetic retinopathy patients. Positive correlation was obtained between the spectral components with the disease condition (r = 0.987). It is found that in all 50 normal subjects the dominant spectral component falls exactly at 2 Hz and the second dominant peak falls in the range of 4–7 Hz (). Figure 3 shows the spectral plot of normal subject. It is shown that the dominant spectral component falls at 2 Hz and the secondary component at 7 Hz. 25 normal subjects' dominant spectral component magnitudes 2D histogram is presented in Figure 4 and the corresponding second dominant peak magnitude values are presented in Figure 5.
Figure 3

Normal subject VEP spectrum.

Figure 4

25 normal patients' first spectral component 2D histogram.

Figure 5

25 normal patients' second spectral component 2D histogram.

It is found that for all the BDR subjects the dominant spectral peak falls in the range of 2–3 Hz and the second dominant peak falls in the range of 5–9 Hz (). Figure 6 shows the spectral plot of BDR subject. It is shown that the dominant spectral component falls at 3 Hz and the secondary component at 6 Hz. 30 BDR subjects' dominant spectral component magnitudes 2D histogram is presented in Figure 7 and the corresponding second dominant peak magnitude values are presented in Figure 8.
Figure 6

BDR subject VEP spectrum.

Figure 7

30 BDR patients' first spectral component 2D histogram.

Figure 8

30 BDR patients' second spectral component 2D histogram.

For PPDR subjects we found that the dominant spectral peak falls in the range of 4–6 Hz and the second dominant peak falls at 2 Hz or in the range of 6–10 Hz (). Figure 9 shows the spectral plot of PPDR subject. It is shown that the dominant spectral component falls at 4 Hz and no secondary component exists. 20 PPDR subjects' dominant spectral component magnitudes 2D histogram is presented in Figure 10 and the corresponding second dominant peak magnitude values are presented in Figure 11.
Figure 9

PPDR subject VEP spectrum.

Figure 10

20 PPDR patients' first spectral component 2D histogram.

Figure 11

20 PPDR patients' second spectral component 2D histogram.

For PDR subjects we found that the dominant spectral peak falls in the range of 6–8 Hz and the second dominant peak falls in the range of 2–3 Hz (). Figure 12 shows the spectral plot of PDR subject. It is shown that the dominant spectral component falls at 6 Hz and no secondary component exists. 20 PDR subjects' dominant spectral component magnitudes 2D histogram are presented in Figure 13 and the corresponding second dominant peak magnitude values are presented in Figure 14.
Figure 12

PDR subject VEP spectrum.

Figure 13

20 PDR patients' first spectral component 2D histogram.

Figure 14

20 PDR patients' second spectral component 2D histogram.

Neural network interpretation of VEP data

The classification ANN was trained on 25 normal and 200 abnormal subjects, that is, BDR, PPDR, and PDR subjects VEP spectral components, and tested on 25 normal subjects and 100 diabetic subjects VEP spectral components. We found that 95% of VEPs were classified correctly. We animated the diabetic retinopathy condition using 3D Max Studio and Windows Movie Maker from the hospital database and correlated with the VEP spectral components. We added voice information along with the picture information, which correlated the VEP wave with stages of diabetic retinopathy and treatment method. Using this animation the patient can identify the change in VEP and change in retinal condition. Users were able to explore the eye components to discover retinopathy characteristics. This animation and simulation model will eventually be used to educate patients and medical students on various aspects of the diabetic retinopathy (Figures 15 and 16).
Figure 15

Animated retinal blood vessel picture.

Figure 16

Animated diabetic retinopathy movie.

DISCUSSION

A system for classification of diabetic retinopathy using VEP spectral components has been developed and tested on prerecorded data from a set of patients. This paper describes a specific application which can be extended to further applications in medicine. Presently we are testing the system on a large patient offline database and in the future it can be implemented for routine clinical use. This method of classification of diabetic retinopathy condition using frequency spectrum and peak frequency components almost coincides with the expected retinopathy condition. These results will have significant usage in analyzing the diabetic retinopathy condition. This system provides an early warning of diabetic retinopathy abnormalities for diabetic patients.
  46 in total

1.  Detection of multiple sclerosis with visual evoked potentials--an unsupervised computational intelligence system.

Authors:  T J Dasey; E Micheli-Tzanakou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2000-09

2.  The rising global burden of diabetes and its complications: estimates and projections to the year 2010.

Authors:  A F Amos; D J McCarty; P Zimmet
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  An adaptive approach to spectral analysis of pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  E B Moody; E Micheli-Tzanakou; S Chokroverty
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Latency measurement improvement of P100 complex in visual evoked potentials by FMH filters.

Authors:  S Fotopoulos; G Economou; A Bezerianos; N Laskaris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 5.  Evoked potentials in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  G Comi
Journal:  Clin Neurosci       Date:  1997

6.  Impaired saccadic eye movement in diabetic patients: the relationship with visual pathways function.

Authors:  M Alessandrini; V Paris; E Bruno; P G Giacomini
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Visual evoked responses in diabetes.

Authors:  K Puvanendran; G Devathasan; P K Wong
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  [Correlated study of visual evoked potentials-polyneuropathy in diabetic patients without retinopathy].

Authors:  M Aguggia; M Baruchello; U Dimanico; P Filippi; M Gilli; A Riccio
Journal:  Minerva Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.806

9.  Involvment of the visual evoked potentials in type I insulin-dependent diabetes.

Authors:  F Ponte; G Giuffrè; M Anastasi; M Lauricella
Journal:  Metab Pediatr Syst Ophthalmol (1985)       Date:  1986

10.  Visual evoked potentials in NIDDM: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  G Moreo; E Mariani; G Pizzamiglio; G B Colucci
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 10.122

View more
  4 in total

1.  Neural network-based diagnosing for optic nerve disease from visual-evoked potential.

Authors:  Sadik Kara; Ayşegül Güven
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Visually evoked potentials after panretinal photocoagulation in omani patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Radha Shenoy; Habiba Al-Belushi; Sadiqa Al-Ajmi; Susan Margaret Al-Nabhani; Shyam Sunder Ganguly; Alexander A Bialasiewicz
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04

3.  Hypoxia in vascular networks: a complex system approach to unravel the diabetic paradox.

Authors:  Yérali Gandica; Tobias Schwarz; Orlando Oliveira; Rui D M Travasso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials in Patients with Type II Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Javad Heravian; Akram Ehyaei; Nasser Shoeibi; Abbass Azimi; Hadi Ostadi-Moghaddam; Abbas-Ali Yekta; Mohamad Javad Khoshsima; Habbibolah Esmaily
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2012-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.