The murine breast cancer cells (4T1) grown both in female BALB/c mice and in culture were treated with anastrozole (50 $\mu$ g/mL), tamoxifen citrate (5 $\mu$ g/mL), and the combination of the two drugs in order to determine treatment efficacies, toxic potential, and the mechanism of cell death. The in vivo treatments were evaluated by monitoring tumor growth, development, and life span. The in vitro effects were measured through cell growth kinetics, cell proliferation, mitochondrial membrane potential disruption assay, and light and scanning electron microscopy. All drug treatments extended the mean life span of the 4T1-inoculated tumor-bearing mice; however, only tamoxifen and combination treatments statistically increased the life span when compared to untreated mice. Although the most drug inhibitory effect on cell multiplication was observed in the combination treatment, both anastrozole and tamoxifen individually inhibited cell proliferation significantly at most time periods in this mouse breast cancer cell line. The mitochondrial membrane potential disruption assay demonstrated significant increase in the percent of cells undergoing apoptosis in all treatment groups. However, the combination treatment was the most effective in inducing cell death via apoptosis. Light and scanning electron microscopy of the treated cells revealed characteristics such as rounding, clumping, and shrinkage of the cells as well as formation of cell surface blebbing and apoptotic bodies suggestive of cell death via apoptotic pathway.
The murinebreast cancer cells (4T1) grown both in female BALB/c mice and in culture were treated with anastrozole (50 $\mu$ g/mL), tamoxifen citrate (5 $\mu$ g/mL), and the combination of the two drugs in order to determine treatment efficacies, toxic potential, and the mechanism of cell death. The in vivo treatments were evaluated by monitoring tumor growth, development, and life span. The in vitro effects were measured through cell growth kinetics, cell proliferation, mitochondrial membrane potential disruption assay, and light and scanning electron microscopy. All drug treatments extended the mean life span of the 4T1-inoculated tumor-bearing mice; however, only tamoxifen and combination treatments statistically increased the life span when compared to untreated mice. Although the most drug inhibitory effect on cell multiplication was observed in the combination treatment, both anastrozole and tamoxifen individually inhibited cell proliferation significantly at most time periods in this mousebreast cancer cell line. The mitochondrial membrane potential disruption assay demonstrated significant increase in the percent of cells undergoing apoptosis in all treatment groups. However, the combination treatment was the most effective in inducing cell death via apoptosis. Light and scanning electron microscopy of the treated cells revealed characteristics such as rounding, clumping, and shrinkage of the cells as well as formation of cell surface blebbing and apoptotic bodies suggestive of cell death via apoptotic pathway.
For the past twenty years, tamoxifen has been the drug of choice
for the treatment of advanced-stage estrogen receptor positive
(ER-positive) breast cancers [1, 2]. This antibreast cancer
drug is often successful in limiting breast cancer growth
initially, but continued use of the drug was known to stimulate
disease progression [3, 4]. Because drug treatment with
tamoxifen is not ideal, other hormonal chemotherapies have been
developed. Second-generation treatments were developed but were
overshadowed by the rapid success and development of the
third-generation aromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole, letrozole,
and vorozole [5]. The most popular of the aromatase
inhibitors is anastrozole, or Arimidex, which is used to treat ER-positive breast cancers
in postmenopausal women. Anastrozole binds to aromatase
eliminating its estradiol synthesizing function, resulting in a
drop in the circulating level of estrogen [6, 7]. In 1995,
anastrozole was originally approved by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) as the first nonsteroidal aromatase
inhibitor for the treatment of tamoxifen-resistant ER-positive
breast cancer [8, 9]. Later, in 2000, anastrozole was
approved for first-line treatment of advanced ER-positive breast
cancer by the FDA [10, 11]. In June 2002, the preliminary
results of a massive anastrozole study comparing its
effectiveness alone and in combination with tamoxifen (ATAC)
found that anastrozole alone was statistically more effective
than either tamoxifen alone or in combination with anastrozole in
the treatment of breast cancer in postmenopausal women [12].
In recent studies, anastrozole was shown to shrink tumor size
allowing previously inoperable breast cancers to become
operable [13].Studies aimed at comparing the efficacies of anastrozole and
tamoxifen in various breast cancer treatment settings and stages
have produced conflicting results. A multicenter randomized trial
revealed that anastrozole was more effective than tamoxifen in
slowing breast cancer tumor progression in women diagnosed with
advanced-stage breast cancer [10]. In contrast, a similar
multicenter randomized trial conducted by Bonneterre et al
[14] reported no significant difference in tumor progression
between women treated with anastrozole and those treated with
tamoxifen. Furthermore, information on the effectiveness of
anastrozole, tamoxifen, and their combination on nonmammalian
breast cancer cells both in in vivo and in vitro settings is
limited. Consequently, future studies evaluating the efficacies of
tamoxifen, anastrozole, and the combination in various mammalian
systems involving different breast cancer cell types are needed
in order to evaluate the best strategy for the treatment of
breast cancers. To the best of our knowledge, no reports on the
effects of treatments with anastrozole, tamoxifen, and the
combination on this mousebreast cancer cell line (4T1) have been published.The 4T1 cells grow as adherent epithelial type in vitro, and are
characterized as murine mammary carcinoma cells
(American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) catalogue no. CRL-2539, 2004).
When injected into BALB/c mice, 4T1 cells rapidly multiply resulting in
highly metastatic tumors. Because these tumors closely imitate
humanbreast cancer, the 4T1 cell line serves as an animal model
for stage IV breast cancer [15]. In this investigation, we
evaluated the effectiveness of anastrozole, tamoxifen, and the
combination on 4T1 cells' ability to induce tumors in BALB/c
female mice. Various parameters such as tumor induction
capability, tumor mass, and mean life span were recorded to
determine the drugs' efficacy on 4T1 cells. Additionally, the
drugs' effects on 4T1 cell growth kinetics, proliferation, and
morphology were investigated. In order to determine the
mechanisms of the death of 4T1 cells exposed to individual and
combination drug treatments, a mitochondrial membrane potential
disruption assay and a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) investigation
were performed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell maintenance
In vivo and in vitro studies were performed utilizing the 4T1
cell line. This cell line was supplied to this laboratory by Dr.
Robert Kurt (Lafayette College, Easton, Pa). The cells were
cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Gibco BRL,
Rockville, Md) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Sigma
Aldrich, St Louis, Mo) (DME-10) and kept in a 37°C
humidified incubator with 7.5% CO2 in air. The 4T1
cells used in the tumor development study were freshly harvested
by Dr. Robert Kurt from 4T1-induced tumors in BALB/c mice.
Mouse maintenance
Three-to-four-week-old female BALB/c mice were purchased from Ace
Animals (Boyerstown, Pa). The mice were housed four or five to a
cage, fed ad libitum, and observed daily. The cages were kept in
a climate-controlled warm animal suite and cleaned weekly.
Approval for this study was attained from the Lafayette College
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and
the mice were handled and euthanized according to its guidelines.
Drug preparation
Tamoxifen citrate ((Z)-1-(p-dimethylaminoethoxyphenyl)-1,2-diphenyl-1-butene) was
purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo). The tamoxifen
citrate powder was dissolved in a phosphate buffered saline (PBS)
solution to a concentration of 1000 μg/mL and stored at
−20°C; this served as a stock solution. The 4T1 cells
utilized in the in vitro studies were treated with a
5 μg/mL concentration of tamoxifen citrate. In the in
vivo study, each mouse was injected subcutaneously with
5 μg of tamoxifen citrate in 0.1 mL of PBS.
Injection protocols are provided in the “tumor development study” section.Arimidex, 1 mg anastrozole tablets, manufactured by Astra Zeneca
(London, England) were obtained through the Bailey Health Center
(Lafayette College, Easton, Pa) from Bell's Apothecary (Easton,
Pa). The tablets were dissolved in PBS to a final concentration
of 500 μg/mL stock solution and stored at −20°C.
Cells for in vitro studies were treated with 30 μg/mL or
50 μg/mL of anastrozole, while mice in the in vivo study
were injected as described above with 50 μg of
anastrozole per mouse daily during the treatment period. The
combination of anastrozole (50 μg/mL) and tamoxifen
(5 μg/mL) was used for both in vitro and in vivo investigations.Camptothecin, a known inducer of apoptosis [16], was
purchased in powder form from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo) and
was dissolved in PBS to a final concentration of 1000 μg/mL. The agent was used
as a positive control in the mitochondrial membrane potential
disruption study (3.5 μg/mL).
Tumor development study
Seven-week-old female BALB/c mice were injected subcutaneously
with 105 4T1 cells suspended in 0.1 mL of PBS on the
upper portion of the right hind thigh on day zero of the study.
The individual or combination regimens of each drug dissolved or
suspended in 0.1 mL PBS were injected subcutaneously on the
inside of either thigh every 48 hours with a 25 gauge syringe.
Each mouse received 14 doses of its designated drug over a 28 day
period. Mice in the untreated group were similarly given 14 doses of 0.1 mL of PBS.The day of tumor induction was recorded. Tumor volume
(tumor volume = length×width2×0.5)
was recorded twice per week following the equation
utilized by Kotoh et al and Ruddy and Majumdar in similar tumor
development studies [17, 18]. The mice were examined every
other day for maladies including rough coat appearance,
discoloration of skin, and swollen abdomen. Mice were sacrificed
approximately 1–2 days prior to their natural death by cervical
dislocation and life span was recorded. After euthanization, the
mice were dissected. The primary tumor, liver, and spleen were removed, studied, and weighed.
Cell kinetics study
Fifty thousand 4T1 cells were seeded in each well of a six-well
plate in 4 mL of DME-10 and treated with tamoxifen citrate,
anastrozole, and the combination of the two drugs. The 4T1 cells
were harvested using a 0.25% buffered trypsin solution (Gibco
BRL, Rockville, Md), and viable cells were counted using the
trypan blue exclusion method at 24-hour intervals for five days.
Cell proliferation study
Ten thousand exponentially growing 4T1 cells were added to each
well of a 96-well plate as suggested by the Quick Cell Proliferation Assay Protocol obtained
from Biovision (Quick Cell Proliferation Assay Kit, Mountain View,
Calif). Anastrozole, tamoxifen, or the combination of the two
drugs was added to the cells in each well. A blank was prepared
by adding only culture media to a row of wells. Twenty-four hours
later, each well was supplied with 10 μL of a mixture of
the tetrazolium salt WST-1 and an electrocoupling solution. The
plate was incubated for three hours in a 37°C humidified
incubator with 7.5% CO2 in air. Mitochondrial
dehydrogenases found in viable cells converted WST-1 to a
formazan dye during this incubation period. Dye formation,
indicative of cell viability, was quantified by measuring
absorbency at 450 nm with an EL312E Automated
Microplate Reader (Bio-TeK instruments, Winooski, Vt). After 24
hours of treatment, the cells were studied under an inverted
Olympus microscope (Melville, NY) at 100× magnification and photographed digitally
using a MX-700 fujifilm digital camera (Tokyo, Japan).
The 4T1 cells were grown on square sterile coverslips in
60 × 15 mm tissue culture dishes with 2 mL of
DME-10. After 24 hours the cells were treated with tamoxifen
citrate, anastrozole, or a combination of tamoxifen citrate and
anastrozole in varied concentrations as specified above for 24,
48, and 72 hours. Camptothecin (3.5 μg/mL), a known
apoptotic inducer, was used as a positive control [16].
Following the Trevigen protocol, using the DesPsipher
Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Disruption Kit (Trevigen, Inc, Gaithersburg, Md), the incubating
solution was prepared which contained 1X reaction buffer,
stabilizing solution, and the DePsipher solution. The adherent
cells on coverslips were incubated for 30 minutes in the above
solution in a humidified incubator at 37°C in 7.5%
CO2 in air. The slides were examined under a fluorescence
microscope (Bausch and Lomb, Rochester, NY) with a dual filter
set of FITC and rhodamine for detection of mitochondrial membrane
potential disruption. The normal membrane potential of
mitochondria was indicated when the DePsipher lipophilic cation
(5,5′,6,6′,tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′,tetraethylbenzimidazolyl carbocyanin) aggregated on the membrane
forming a red-orange fluorescent compound. However, if the
membrane polarization is disrupted, the cation cannot access the
mitochondrial transmembrane space and the cells remain green.
This is an early indication of apoptosis. Approximately 300 cells
per treatment and time interval were examined. Photographs were
taken using an Olympus C-35 camera (Tokyo, Japan) with ISO 1600
speed film utilizing a 30-second time exposure.
Scanning electron microscopy
The 4T1 cells were grown on sterile circular coverslips in small
culture dishes in 3 mL of DME-10 with either tamoxifen
citrate, anastrozole, or the combination of the two drugs. After
48 hours of drug treatment, the cells were fixed in 2%
glutaraldehyde, post fixed in a 1% osmium tetroxide solution,
dehydrated in an ascending series of ethanol, and critically
point dried (Polaron E3000, Mountain View, Calif). The cells were
sputter-coated with gold palladium using a Cressington 108 auto
sputter coater (Cranberry Township, Pa) and examined with an ISI
Super III A scanning electron microscope. Photographs were taken
with B52 and B55 Polaroid pan films as well as the Printerface
computer program.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses pertaining to toxicological experiments were
performed according to the statistical methods recommended by Gad
and Weil [19]. These included Bartlett's homogeneity of
variance, unpaired Student's t test, F test, Tukey's test, chi-square test,
and Fisher's exact test [19, 20].
Microsoft Excel was used to compile data and to create corresponding graphs and tables.
RESULTS
Table 1 summarizes the results of the tumor development study.
Mice were sacrificed approximately 2–3 days prior to natural death by cervical
dislocation. Matting and thinning of fur, discoloration of skin, substantial
tumor size causing paralysis, large swollen abdomens, frailty or thinning, and
overall lethargy were the characteristics used as indicators of near death.
The mean life span of each treatment group was calculated. Utilizing an unpaired
unequal variance Student t test, the mean life spans of the tamoxifen-treated
mice were found to be significantly longer than the mean life spans of the mice
in the anastrozole treated and untreated groups (see Figure 1). The
combination treatment also extended the life spans of the mice which were found
to be statistically different from the untreated group () but not from either the anastrozole- or tamoxifen-treated groups (see Table 1).
Tamoxifen appeared to be most effective in the trial. Tumor volume was measured
throughout the experiment but no statistical significance was found on any day
across the treatment groups. After death the tumors were removed and studied.
Mean tumor mass at death was calculated and the average tumor mass of
tamoxifen-treated mice was found to be significantly larger than that of the untreated
group by the Student t test (see Table 1). Those mice with both
swollen abdomens and discolored skin, sacrificed early due to their very
ill appearance, had smaller tumors. Upon dissection, the abdomens of these mice
were found to be filled with a dark brown fluid. When the fluid was removed from
its source and injected into BALB/c female mice, 100% tumor formation occurred
at the site of injection within 14 days.
Table 1
Summarized results of the tumor development study.
Female BALB/c mice were inoculated with 10 000 4T1 cells
subcutaneously in the right hind thigh and treated with
anastrozole, tamoxifen, the combination, or the untreated
phosphate buffered solution.
Mean tumor detection day ± SEM
Mean life span ± SEM
Mean tumor mass at death ± SEM
Untreated
10.8 ± 1.1
24.8 ± 1.7
0.841 ± 0.325
Anastrozole
11 ± 0.7
26.9 ± 1.6
1.252 ± 0.308
Tamoxifen
9.5 ± 0.7
31 ± 1.1*⧫
1.840 ± 0.173*
Anastrozole + Tamoxifen
10.5 ± 0.7
29 ± 1.6*
1.413 ± 0.215
*Statistical difference from the untreated control group
(), as determined by the Student t test.
⧫Statistical difference from the anastrozole-treated group
(), as determined by the Student t test.
Figure 1
Mean life spans of 4T1-inoculated mice.
Stars indicate statistical difference from the
untreated group (), as determined by the Student t
test. Bars represent ± SEM.
Because of the high metastatic characteristic of 4T1 cells, the spleens and
livers of 4T1-inoculated mice were also examined post
mortem for evidence of secondary cancer development. Spleen
enlargement was observed in 4T1-inoculated mice that did not
receive the drug (see Figure 2). In the untreated
group, the spleen mass was as much as ten times larger than that
of a cancer-free mouse. Although there was no statistical
difference in the averages of spleen size at death across the
treatment groups, mice sacrificed from each group on day 28 of
the experiment exhibited clear size and mass differences. The
largest spleen size and mass were detected in the 4T1-inoculated
mouse that received no drug treatment. The spleen size and mass
increased over the remaining treatments of anastrozole-, tamoxifen-,
and combination-treated mice, respectively. Cancerous nodules
often appeared in the livers of 4T1-infected mice although no
significant variation in mean liver mass at death was found
across the treatment groups. Furthermore, the mean tumor
detection day across the treatment groups revealed no statistical
difference (see Table 1).
Figure 2
Spleen masses of female BALB/c mice on day 28 of the
experiment. All mice except the normal (negative control) were inoculated
with 4T1 cells 28 days prior to spleen removal and treated with either PBS,
anastrozole, tamoxifen, or the combination.
Cell multiplication study
Cell growth inhibition of 4T1 in presence of anastrozole was in
general concentration-dependent. The 50 μg/mL
anastrozole treatment statistically reduced viable cell number
compared to the untreated control at all time periods, while the
30 μg/mL anastrozole treatment differed significantly
from the untreated cells only at 96 and 120 hours (see
Figure 3). When 30 μg/mL and
50 μg/mL
of anastrozole treatments were compared, a statistical difference
in the number of viable 4T1 cells was detected at the 72-hour time period.
Figure 3
Cell growth kinetics of untreated and anastrozole-treated 4T1
(30 or 50 μg/mL). Stars indicate a statistical difference in
number of viable cells from the untreated groups (), as determined
by the Student t test. A diamond indicates a statistical difference between
the two anastrozole concentration groups. Bars represent ± SEM.
Both the tamoxifen (5 μg/mL) and the combination treatment
(anastrozole 50 μg/mL and tamoxifen 5 μg/mL)
inhibited 4T1 cell growth (see Figure 4). The number
of viable cells in the tamoxifen- and combination-treatment groups
was statistically fewer than in the untreated cells at 48, 72, 96,
and 120 hour time periods. The combination treatment was found to
be a more effective inhibitor of 4T1 viability than the tamoxifen
treatment at all time periods. At all time periods, the
number of viable 4T1 cells treated with the combination was less
than the number of cells used in the initiation of the study. When
compared to anastrozole (50 μg/mL), the combination
treatment was found to exert a greater inhibitory effect on cell
multiplication; anastrozole alone (50 μg/mL), however,
was more effective than tamoxifen in reducing 4T1 cell viability following 24 hours of drug treatment.
Figure 4
Growth kinetics of untreated, tamoxifen-treated (5 μg/mL),
and combination-treated (anastrozole 50 μg/mL and tamoxifen
5 μg/mL) 4T1 cells. Combination treatment drastically reduced cell
number throughout the study period. Stars indicate statistical difference
in number of viable cells from the untreated groups (). Bars represent ± SEM.
Cell proliferation
In order to determine 4T1 cell viability following 24 hours of
drug treatment, a WST-1 solution was added to each well and
converted to a quantifiable yellow dye by mitochondrial
dehydrogenases present in viable cells, thus serving as an
indirect gauge of 4T1 viability. (See “materials and methods.”) A
microplate reader was used to measure the absorbency of the
solution in each well. Statistical analysis of the absorbencies
revealed a decrease in 4T1 cell viability following 24 hour
anastrozole and combination drug treatments when compared to
untreated cells. No statistical difference was detected between
the anastrozole and combination treatments (see Figure 5).
Additionally, both anastrozole- and combination-treatment
groups had significantly less viable cells than the tamoxifen-treated group.
Figure 5
Cell proliferation assay results utilizing absorbency
(450 nm) as a measure of viability in cells untreated or treated
with anastrozole (50 μg/mL), tamoxifen (5 μg/mL), or
the combination (anastrozole and tamoxifen). Stars indicate a statistical
difference from the untreated groups (). Diamonds indicate a
statistical difference from the tamoxifen group (). Bars represent ± SEM.
Light microscopy
Untreated samples exhibited the cell's normal morphology (see
Figure 6a). The adherent cells are either rounded
or are stretched to an elongated shape by the presence of long
cytoplasmic processes called lamellipodia. In contrast, most
cells in the drug-treated groups appeared rounded and irregular
in shape and exhibited clumping as well as destruction of cell
membrane, cell lysis, and cell fragmentation (see
Figures 6b, 6c, and 6d).
In addition to the heterogeneous appearance, there was also a decrease in cell
number in all treatment groups; however, this effect was more
pronounced in the tamoxifen and combination groups.
Figure 6
Light microscopy images of 4T1 cells (a) untreated or
treated for 24 hours with (b) anastrozole (50 μg/mL),
(c) tamoxifen citrate (5 μg/mL), or (d) the combination of the two
drugs. Untreated 4T1 cells are either rounded or flattened.
Drug-treated cells appear mostly rounded in shape, clumped, and
disrupted (×100).
Mitochondrial membrane potential disruption
In most cases treated cells appeared rounded and green under the
fluorescence microscope due to the mitochondrial membrane
disruption in the DePsipher assay pointing to an early sign of
apoptosis. In contrast, 68%–72% of untreated
cells showed red-orange coloration during the 72 hour study period
indicating nondisruption of the mitochondrial membrane (see
Figure 7). Chi-square analysis demonstrated
significant differences among the untreated and treated
groups, signifying that these two drugs alone and in combination
elicited a higher incidence of apoptosis. As expected, the
combination treatment was found to be the most potent in inducing
cell death possibly via apoptosis which generally paralleled
camptothecin treatment. The incidence of cell death observed
between the combination and tamoxifen was statistically different
at 72 hours. Tamoxifen compared to anastrozole appeared more
effective in inducing death in 4T1mousebreast cancer cells (see
Figure 7).
Figure 7
Incidence of apoptotic 4T1 cells as detected through
mitochondrial membrane potential disruption assay. Stars indicate
statistical difference (chi-square) from the untreated group
(). Statistical difference among the time periods is
indicated by crosses. Diamonds demonstrate statistical difference
between tamoxifen (5 μg/mL) and anastrozole
(50 μg/mL), camptothecin (3.5 μg/mL), and the
combination (50 + 5 μg/mL) whereas squares indicate
statistical difference among anastrozole, camptothecin, and the
combination. Bars indicate ± 1 SEM.
The two drugs alone or in combination induced surface
ultrastructural changes in 4T1 cells (see Figure 8).
Untreated 4T1 cells were both spherical and flattened with long
cytoplasmic processes (see Figure 8a). The
untreated groups exhibited certain frequencies of clumping
normally after 48 hours; this is depicted at higher magnification
in Figure 8b. The cultures exposed to anastrozole
for 24 hours showed rounding and clumping as well as thinning of
lamellipodia (see Figure 8c). Various surface
abnormalities including apoptotic bodies and blebs as well as
lysed cells were discerned at higher magnification (see Figure 8d).
Figure 8
Scanning electron micrographs of untreated and
24-hour-treated 4T1 cells with anastrozole
(50 μg/mL), tamoxifen citrate
(5 μg/mL), and the combination of the
two drugs (50 μg/mL
and 5 μg/mL). (a) Characteristics of untreated
24 hour culture showing rounded and flattened cells. (b) Normal surface characteristics
of untreated clumped cells shown at 48 hour. (c) Twenty-four-hour anastrozole-treated
4T1 cells showing various surface abnormalities (arrows). (d) Enlarged view
of 24-hour anastrozole-treated 4T1 cells depicting apoptotic bodies (a), blebs (b),
and lysed cells (l). (e) Tamoxifen-treated cells at 24 hour depicting irregularly
shaped cells with apoptotic bodies (a) and holes (h). (f) Anastrozole- and
tamoxifen-treated cells. The irregularly shaped cells depict many surface
ultrastructural changes including blebs and membrane holes.
Significantly fewer cells and more cell clumping were observed in
the tamoxifen-treated group as compared to untreated cells viewed
at the same magnification. The tamoxifen-treated cells were
irregular in shape with little or no lamellipodia. Formation of
apoptotic bodies, membrane blebbing, and holes in the cell
membrane was evident (see Figure 8e). Exposure to
the combination of anastrozole and tamoxifen resulted in the most
drastic changes in cell numbers and ultrastructure (see
Figure 8f). Membrane blebs, holes, and apoptotic
bodies as well as lysed and irregularly shaped cell clumps of various sizes were detected.
DISCUSSION
Since the 1970, tamoxifen has been used to treat hormone-sensitive
breast cancers. However, studies have shown that prolonged
treatment with tamoxifen may yield tamoxifen-resistant breast
cancer [3]. In 1995, anastrozole, a third-generation
nonsteroidal inhibitor, was introduced and later approved to
treat both early- and advanced-stage ER-positive
breast cancers [10, 21]. Still, efficacy data comparing the
two drugs on various breast cancer types are incomplete
[22]. This study was initiated to investigate the effects of
the two drugs alone and in combination on mousebreast cancer
cells (4T1 cell line) in inducing tumor in BALB/c female mice and
the drugs' role in 4T1 cell growth kinetics, proliferation, and
morphology and to decipher the mechanisms of drug-induced cell death.This study has shown that treatment with tamoxifen significantly
increased the life spans of 4T1-inoculated mice when compared to
anastrozole-treated or-untreated mice. Similarly, the
combination treatment with anastrozole and tamoxifen also
lengthened the lives of mice when compared to untreated mice.
There was no significant difference between the tamoxifen and
combination groups even though the mice in the combination groups
received full doses of both drugs. Therefore, anastrozole did not
appear to be effective alone or in combination in this in vivo mouse study.Preliminary reports from large-scale studies like ATAC
reported that anastrozole's efficacy in humans was superior
to that of tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting [12]. A study conducted
by Lu et al [23] found that treatment with letrozole, another
aromatase inhibitor, was more effective in suppressing humantumor growth in nude mice than the tamoxifen treatment or the
combination treatment of letrozole and tamoxifen. In a similar
study conducted by Long et al [24], letrozole again
demonstrated superior efficacy when compared to tamoxifen in
terms of time for tumor progression in mice. However, the female
BALB/c mice used in our study contained both ovaries unlike the
mice utilized in the studies conducted by Lu et al [23]
and Long et al [24]. Since ovaries are the main site of estrogen production
in premenopausal women, it is reasonable to infer that estrogen
levels in these mice were significantly higher than those in
ovariectomized mice. Premenopausal women have estrogen levels of
approximately 379 pcg/mL, while postmenopausal women have
estrogen concentrations around 83 pcg/mL [25].
Therefore, even if anastrozole is blocking estrogen production by
inhibiting aromatase, significant levels of estrogen would still
be present and thus estrogen-stimulated tumor progression could proceed.Tamoxifen works by binding directly to the estrogen receptor,
forming an estrogen receptor complex. Unlike anastrozole,
tamoxifen's mechanism of action is independent of circulating
levels of estrogen. In fact, tamoxifen is effective against
ER-positive breast cancer found in premenopausal
women [2]. Therefore, even if estrogen levels in our in vivo
study are more similar to those in premenopausal women than those found
in postmenopausal women, we would still expect the drug to elicit
an inhibitory effect on 4T1mousebreast cancer growth. This
effect was demonstrated in the present investigation by the
observed increase in mouse life span treated with tamoxifen and the combination.Conversely, no statistical significance was observed in tumor
induction time, calculated average tumor volume, or liver and
spleen mass at death in any of the treatment groups when compared
to untreated mice. One factor that may have contributed to the
lack of statistical significance in these areas was probably due
to the high number of cells used to induce the tumor. In a
subsequent study performed in our laboratory,
female BALB/c mice were injected with 1000 and 5000 4T1
cells and tumor development was studied. All mice developed
palpable tumors by day 18 of the study. The high metastatic
ability of the 4T1 cell line was demonstrated in a study
conducted by Pulaski et al [26]. These investigators noted
that 4T1 metastasizes to the lungs, livers, and brains of
inoculated mice as early as two to three weeks after a 7000 4T1
cell inoculation. Therefore, the initial injection of 10 000
4T1 cells used in our study was most likely too strong in terms
of tumor development for differential tumor volume observations
for the treatment groups. However, the difference in spleen size
noted on day 28 may be an indication of different degrees of 4T1
metastasis occurring across the treatment groups. Tamoxifen
treatment may have played a role in prolonging the life of the
BALB/c mice by slowing down the metastasis to other areas of the body.Tumor, spleen, and liver mass at death did not serve as good
indicators of drug efficacy because of the differential survival
time observed for the mice across the treatment groups. Because
mice in the tamoxifen treatment group typically lived longer than
mice in the groups that did not receive any of the drugs, these
mice had a longer period of time for primary tumor and spleen
enlargement. This could explain the significant difference in
tumor mass at death observed between tamoxifen-treated
and- untreated mice.Several mice that were near death early in the study were
characterized by a swollen abdomen. These mice suffered from
ascites, a condition characterized by excess fluid in the
abdomen. In a 2002 study, Hasumi et al [27] reported that
advanced ovarian cancer often invades the peritoneal cavity
resulting in ascites that sometimes contained malignant cells.
The development of ascites was shown to inversely affect survival
time in humans by Roszkowski et al [28]. Mice observed with
abnormally swollen abdomens in this study were determined to be
close to natural death and were sacrificed. After dissection,
fluid from the abdomen was collected and injected into three
BALB/c mice. Tumor formation in all the three mice indicated that
the ascites condition occurred as a result of the 4T1 metastasis.The cell kinetics study conducted in vitro revealed that
anastrozole, tamoxifen, and the combination of the two drugs
elicited a growth inhibitory response in the 4T1mouse mammary
carcinoma cell line. The 50 μg/mL anastrozole and
combination treatments significantly reduced cell viability in
each study period when compared to untreated cells, while
tamoxifen-treated cells did not differ significantly from untreated cells after 24
hours of drug treatment. These results agree with the quantified
cell proliferation results. However, in the qualitative analysis,
utilizing both light and scanning electron microscopy, tamoxifen
and combination treatments appeared to be more damaging than
anastrozole alone in altering 4T1 cell morphology. Furthermore,
fewer 4T1 cells were observed per field of view in the tamoxifen
and combination treatments when compared to anastrozole or
untreated cells. Compared to anastrozole, the cells treated with
tamoxifen showed more cell damages such as lysis, irregular cell
shapes, blebbing, and prevalence of membrane holes after 24 hours of drug treatment.A possible explanation for the apparent discrepancy between
quantitative and qualitative data might be due to the disruption
of cell adhesion leading to detachment of cells from the
substratum. In 2002, Palencia et al [29], in their study on
thalidomide, suggested that although the agent was not cytotoxic
to neoplastic cells, it might have inhibited tumor growth by
blocking cell-surface adhesion receptors. A similar mechanism may
be in operation with tamoxifen. Tamoxifen might have altered the
cell's ability to adhere to the cell surface releasing it into
the media without initially killing the cell. In a study
conducted by Damiano, integrin cell adhesion molecules were shown
to protect myeloma cells from drug-induced apoptosis. They
suggested that integrin antagonists capable of isolating tumor
cells would be effective in cancer treatment by sensitizing the
cell and making the cell more prone to apoptosis [30].
Tamoxifen's reduction of cell adhesion demonstrated in vitro may
be indicative of interruption of normal integrin reception. The
tamoxifen-induced loss of cell adhesion combined with anastrozole
treatment in the cell multiplication study may explain the
significant decrease in cell viability observed when the two
drugs were administered in combination compared to either agent
alone. The adverse effects of the drugs on proteins that are
required to maintain cell structures such as intermediate
filaments, actin, gelsolin, and laminin might have led to
changes in cell shape, cell fragmentations, as well as in
formation of cell membrane blebbing and apoptotic bodies[31].The mitochondrial membrane potential disruption assay was used to
detect one of intracellular changes occurring in the activation
phase of apoptosis in 4T1 cells [32, 33]. Apoptosis, or
programmed cell death, is a mechanism of cell suicide which can
be divided into two major phases: the activation and execution
phases [31]. A variety of chemotherapeutic drugs initiate
apoptosis in tumor cells leading to the regression of a canceroustumor [32]. In this study, all treatment groups exhibited a
higher incidence of apoptosis compared to untreated cells.
Estrogen is a known apoptotic inhibitor [34]. It is possible
that both anastrozole and tamoxifen directed the cells toward
apoptosis by interfering with various estrogen signaling events.
In their study, Davis and Majumdar reported that raloxifene, a
selective estrogen receptor modulator with anti-breast-cancer
potential, showed high incidences of apoptosis through disruption
of the mitochondrial membrane [32]. In our study, the highest
incidence of apoptosis was seen in the combination treatment of
tamoxifen citrate and anastrozole. However, at 72 hours no
significant difference was detected between combination- and
tamoxifen-treated cells due to an extremely high incidence of
cell loss. Since mitochondrial membrane potential disruption was
observed in all treatment groups, the results of this assay
suggest that the initial mechanism of cell death elicited by
anastrozole, tamoxifen, and the combination was triggered via
apoptotic pathway.Surface ultrastructural characteristics detected in the SEM study
also suggest that apoptosis may be the mechanism of drug-induced
cell death at the initial treatment period. Specific
morphological alteration identified in the micrographs of
drug-treated cells included apoptotic body formation, cell
membrane blebbing, and thinning of lamellipodia; these are
characteristics which are indicative of apoptosis [35, 36].
Perry et al used transmission electron microscopy to conclude
that apoptosis was induced in humanbreast cancer cells following
exposure to tamoxifen [37].Efficacies of anastrozole, tamoxifen, and the combination
treatments were examined in in vitro and in vivo settings in the
mouse model. While in vitro experiments showed a significant
growth inhibitory effect in 4T1mousebreast cancer cells exposed
to all treatments, the in vivo tumor development study indicated
that tamoxifen and the combination treatments extended the
survival time for BALB/c female mice. Although the survivability
was increased by several days in anastrozole-treated mice, the
difference in life span between the anastrozole-treated and untreated 4T1-inoculated mice
was not statistically significant. In vitro assay procedures might
suggest that both the drugs and their combination treatments
extended cell death via an apoptotic pathway.
Authors: J Bonneterre; B Thürlimann; J F Robertson; M Krzakowski; L Mauriac; P Koralewski; I Vergote; A Webster; M Steinberg; M von Euler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-11-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Buzdar; W Jonat; A Howell; S E Jones; C Blomqvist; C L Vogel; W Eiermann; J M Wolter; M Azab; A Webster; P V Plourde Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Wendan Wang; Aashvini Belosay; Xujuan Yang; James A Hartman; Huaxin Song; Urszula T Iwaniec; Russell T Turner; Mona I Churchwell; Daniel R Doerge; William G Helferich Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2016-05-21 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Shazia Ali; Neelima Mondal; Hani Choudhry; Mahmood Rasool; Peter N Pushparaj; Mohammad A Khan; Maryam Mahfooz; Ghufrana A Sami; Jummanah Jarullah; Ashraf Ali; Mohammad S Jamal Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 6.244