Literature DB >> 15689391

Possible effects of depolarizing GABAA conductance on the neuronal input-output relationship: a modeling study.

Kenji Morita1, Kunichika Tsumoto, Kazuyuki Aihara.   

Abstract

Recent in vitro experiments revealed that the GABAA reversal potential is about 10 mV higher than the resting potential in mature mammalian neocortical pyramidal cells; thus GABAergic inputs could have facilitatory, rather than inhibitory, effects on action potential generation under certain conditions. However, how the relationship between excitatory input conductances and the output firing rate is modulated by such depolarizing GABAergic inputs under in vivo circumstances has not yet been understood. We examine herewith the input-output relationship in a simple conductance-based model of cortical neurons with the depolarized GABAA reversal potential, and show that a tonic depolarizing GABAergic conductance up to a certain amount does not change the relationship between a tonic glutamatergic driving conductance and the output firing rate, whereas a higher GABAergic conductance prevents spike generation. When the tonic glutamatergic and GABAergic conductances are replaced by in vivo-like highly fluctuating inputs, on the other hand, the effect of depolarizing GABAergic inputs on the input-output relationship critically depends on the degree of coincidence between glutamatergic input events and GABAergic ones. Although a wide range of depolarizing GABAergic inputs hardly changes the firing rate of a neuron driven by noncoincident glutamatergic inputs, a certain range of these inputs considerably decreases the firing rate if a large number of driving glutamatergic inputs are coincident with them. These results raise the possibility that the depolarized GABAA reversal potential is not a paradoxical mystery, but is instead a sophisticated device for discriminative firing rate modulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15689391     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00988.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  Bidirectional modulation of neuronal responses by depolarizing GABAergic inputs.

Authors:  Kenji Morita; Kunichika Tsumoto; Kazuyuki Aihara
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Non-monotonic effects of GABAergic synaptic inputs on neuronal firing.

Authors:  Aghil Abed Zadeh; Brandon D Turner; Nicole Calakos; Nicolas Brunel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Synaptic integration in hypothalamic gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons.

Authors:  C B Roberts; P Hemond; K J Suter
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Unitary IPSPs enhance hilar mossy cell gain in the rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Angharad M Kerr; Marco Capogna
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Tonic excitation or inhibition is set by GABA(A) conductance in hippocampal interneurons.

Authors:  Inseon Song; Leonid Savtchenko; Alexey Semyanov
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Reduction of anion reversal potential subverts the inhibitory control of firing rate in spinal lamina I neurons: towards a biophysical basis for neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Steven A Prescott; Terrence J Sejnowski; Yves De Koninck
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 3.395

Review 7.  Anion transport and GABA signaling.

Authors:  Christian A Hübner; Knut Holthoff
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 5.505

8.  Extreme sensitivity of gene expression in human SH-SY5Y neurocytes to ultra-low doses of Gelsemium sempervirens.

Authors:  Marta Marzotto; Debora Olioso; Maurizio Brizzi; Paola Tononi; Mirco Cristofoletti; Paolo Bellavite
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.659

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.