Literature DB >> 15688024

Nonhomologous end-joining of site-specific but not of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks is reduced in the presence of wild-type p53.

Jochen Dahm-Daphi1, Petra Hubbe, Fruzsina Horvath, Raafat A El-Awady, Katie E Bouffard, Simon N Powell, Henning Willers.   

Abstract

Nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) entails two principal mechanisms: modification of DNA ends prior to ligation (error-prone rejoining) or precise ligation without modification if the DNA ends are complementary (error-free repair). Error-prone rejoining is mutagenic, because it can lead to destruction of coding sequence or to chromosomal aberrations, and therefore must be tightly regulated. Previous studies on the role of the p53 tumor suppressor in the regulation of NHEJ have yielded conflicting results, but a rigorous analysis of NHEJ proficiency and fidelity in a purely chromosomal context has not been carried out. To this end, we created novel repair plasmid substrates that integrate into the genome. DSBs generated by the I-SceI endonuclease within these substrates were repaired by either error-prone rejoining or precise ligation. We found that the expression of wild-type p53 inhibited any repair-associated DNA sequence deletion, including a more than 250-fold inhibition of error-prone rejoining events compared to p53-null cells, while any promoting effect of p53 on precise ligation could not be directly evaluated. The role of p53 in NHEJ appeared to involve a direct transactivation-independent mechanism, possibly restricting DNA end-modification by blocking the annealing of single strands along flanking stretches of microhomology. The inhibition of error-prone rejoining by p53 did not apply to the rejoining of DSBs induced by ionizing radiation. In conclusion, our data suggest that p53 restricts the mutagenic effects of NHEJ without compromising repair proficiency or cell survival, thereby maintaining genomic stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15688024     DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  26 in total

1.  p53 mediates senescence-like arrest induced by chronic replicational stress.

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Linda J Wheeler; Christopher K Mathews; James DeGregori
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Exonuclease function of human Mre11 promotes deletional nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Jing Zhuang; Guochun Jiang; Henning Willers; Fen Xia
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  DNA repair in murine embryonic stem cells and differentiated cells.

Authors:  Elisia D Tichy; Peter J Stambrook
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 3.905

4.  Genome sequencing of pediatric medulloblastoma links catastrophic DNA rearrangements with TP53 mutations.

Authors:  Tobias Rausch; David T W Jones; Marc Zapatka; Adrian M Stütz; Thomas Zichner; Joachim Weischenfeldt; Natalie Jäger; Marc Remke; David Shih; Paul A Northcott; Elke Pfaff; Jelena Tica; Qi Wang; Luca Massimi; Hendrik Witt; Sebastian Bender; Sabrina Pleier; Huriye Cin; Cynthia Hawkins; Christian Beck; Andreas von Deimling; Volkmar Hans; Benedikt Brors; Roland Eils; Wolfram Scheurlen; Jonathon Blake; Vladimir Benes; Andreas E Kulozik; Olaf Witt; Dianna Martin; Cindy Zhang; Rinnat Porat; Diana M Merino; Jonathan Wasserman; Nada Jabado; Adam Fontebasso; Lars Bullinger; Frank G Rücker; Konstanze Döhner; Hartmut Döhner; Jan Koster; Jan J Molenaar; Rogier Versteeg; Marcel Kool; Uri Tabori; David Malkin; Andrey Korshunov; Michael D Taylor; Peter Lichter; Stefan M Pfister; Jan O Korbel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  TRIMming p53's anticancer activity.

Authors:  S Elabd; G Meroni; C Blattner
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  EGF receptor inhibition radiosensitizes NSCLC cells by inducing senescence in cells sustaining DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Meng Wang; Fabian Morsbach; David Sander; Liliana Gheorghiu; Akash Nanda; Cyril Benes; Malte Kriegs; Mechthild Krause; Ekkehard Dikomey; Michael Baumann; Jochen Dahm-Daphi; Jeffrey Settleman; Henning Willers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Chromosome instability and deregulated proliferation: an unavoidable duo.

Authors:  Courtney H Coschi; Frederick A Dick
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Distinct roles of chromatin-associated proteins MDC1 and 53BP1 in mammalian double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Anyong Xie; Andrea Hartlerode; Manuel Stucki; Shobu Odate; Nadine Puget; Amy Kwok; Ganesh Nagaraju; Catherine Yan; Frederick W Alt; Junjie Chen; Stephen P Jackson; Ralph Scully
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Synthesis-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining accounts for multiple types of repair junctions.

Authors:  Amy Marie Yu; Mitch McVey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 19.160

10.  Repair of chromosomal double-strand breaks by precise ligation in human cells.

Authors:  William Y Lin; John H Wilson; Yunfu Lin
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.