Literature DB >> 15687855

A variability study of computerized sagittal spinopelvic radiologic measurements of trunk balance.

E Berthonnaud1, H Labelle, P Roussouly, G Grimard, G Vaz, J Dimnet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The accurate measurement of spinal and pelvic alignment in the sagittal plane is of prime importance for various disorders. Pelvic incidence (PI) is a fundamental anatomic parameter that is specific and constant for each adult individual and is related to pelvic orientation as well as to the size of lumbar lordosis (LL). It is the summation of the sacral slope (SS) and pelvic tilt (PT), two position-dependent variables that determine pelvic orientation in the sagittal plane. The authors have proposed a computer software designed to measure PI, SS, PT, LL, and thoracic kyphosis (TK) on standardized standing lateral digitized x-rays of the spine and pelvis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intraobserver variability of measurements using this software, to determine if it can be used reliably in a clinical environment.
METHODS: The standing lateral x-rays of 30 subjects were randomly selected from the database of two medical institutions. The normal population had standard radiographs on which the various pertinent landmarks were marked by one operator prior to digitization, whereas the scoliotic population had digital radiographs that obviated the need for prior marking of landmarks. Four individuals measured all variables on the 30 x-rays on two occasions, with a 15-day interval between the two sessions. Statistical analysis was done with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
RESULTS: The ICC measured within observers was between 0.93 and 0.99, whereas the ICC between observers varied between 0.92 and 0.99. The variations observed were similar for normal and scoliotic subjects, and prior marking of the x-rays had no significant influence.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the variability of measurements with this method is lower than with similar radiologic measures done manually and that the use of this software can be recommended for future clinical and research studies of spinopelvic sagittal balance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15687855     DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000128345.32521.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  18 in total

1.  Age- and sex-related variations in sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; P Roussouly; E Berthonnaud; P Guigui
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Intra- and inter-observer reliability of determining radiographic sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis using a manual and a computer-assisted methods.

Authors:  John R Dimar; Leah Y Carreon; Hubert Labelle; Mladen Djurasovic; Mark Weidenbaum; Courtney Brown; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity and the effect of restoring the spinal shapes according to the Roussouly classification: a multicentric study.

Authors:  Amer Sebaaly; Martin Gehrchen; Clément Silvestre; Khalil Kharrat; Tanvir Johanning Bari; Gabi Kreichati; Maroun Rizkallah; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Reproducibility and repeatability of a new computerized software for sagittal spinopelvic and scoliosis curvature radiologic measurements: Keops(®).

Authors:  C Maillot; E Ferrero; D Fort; C Heyberger; J-C Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification.

Authors:  Féthi Laouissat; Amer Sebaaly; Martin Gehrchen; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Lumbo-pelvic lordosis and the pelvic radius technique in the assessment of spinal sagittal balance: strengths and caveats.

Authors:  I G Sergides; Peter F McCombe; G White; Sabarul Mokhtar; William R Sears
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The impact of body mass index and central obesity on the spino-pelvic parameters: a correlation study.

Authors:  S Romero-Vargas; B Zárate-Kalfópulos; E Otero-Cámara; L Rosales-Olivarez; A Alpízar-Aguirre; Eugenio Morales-Hernández; Alejandro Reyes-Sánchez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Effects of body mass index, mesenteric and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue on the spinopelvic parameters.

Authors:  Emine Uysal; Yahya Paksoy; Mustafa Koplay; Alaaddin Nayman; Serter Gumus
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 1.704

9.  Prevalence of radiographic findings in individuals with chronic low back pain screened for a randomized controlled trial: secondary analysis and clinical implications.

Authors:  Robert D Vining; Eric Potocki; Ian McLean; Michael Seidman; A Paige Morgenthal; James Boysen; Christine Goertz
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Spino-pelvic alignment after surgical correction for developmental spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Hubert Labelle; Pierre Roussouly; Daniel Chopin; Eric Berthonnaud; Timothy Hresko; Mike O'Brien
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.