Literature DB >> 15687615

The delayed diagnosis of breast cancer: medicolegal implications and risk prevention for surgeons.

K A Kern1.   

Abstract

The delayed diagnosis of breast cancer is a leading source of error in clinical practice, and an important cause of medical malpractice claims for surgeons and other clinicians. If clinical situations frequently leading to the delayed diagnosis of breast cancer could be predicted, misdiagnosis could be avoided more easily. Therefore, a policy of risk prevention should focus on understanding which group of patients fall into a high-risk profile for diagnostic errors, and why physicians commonly commit errors when evaluating these specific patients. Drawing on multiple sources of medical malpractice information, a profile of high-risk for misdiagnosis was created and analyzed. We have identified a "Triad of Error" for misdiagnosed breast cancer, involving (1) young patients, with (2) self-discovered breast masses, and (3) negative mammograms. The "Triad of Error" accounts for the majority of cases of misdiagnosed breast cancer. An understanding by surgeons and other clinicians of the clinical, biological, and technical basis for the "Triad of Error", and how these factors interact to produce misdiagnoses, should lead to more rapid diagnosis of breast cancer, and fewer medical liability claims. The surgeon plays a central role in preventing the delayed diagnosis of breast cancer by interrupting this cycle of diagnostic error, through the use of tissue sampling techniques that rapidly establish a definitive diagnosis of breast abnormalities.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 15687615     DOI: 10.3233/bd-2001-12115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Dis        ISSN: 0888-6008


  5 in total

1.  Characteristics and predictors of missed opportunities in lung cancer diagnosis: an electronic health record-based study.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Kamal Hirani; Himabindu Kadiyala; Olga Rudomiotov; Traber Davis; Myrna M Khan; Terry L Wahls
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Multidisciplinary care in the oncology setting: historical perspective and data from lung and gynecology multidisciplinary clinics.

Authors:  Laura Elise Horvath; Edgardo Yordan; Deepak Malhotra; Ileana Leyva; Katy Bortel; Denise Schalk; Patricia Mellinger; Marianne Huml; Christy Kesslering; Jeffrey Huml
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 3.  Redefining the sensitivity of screening mammography: A review.

Authors:  Alan B Hollingsworth
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Medicolegal implications of accuracy of GP referral letters to specialist breast clinic.

Authors:  A Ahmed; A Marginan; K Sweeney; C Malone; R McLaughlin; M Kerin
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Historical Origins for the Overestimation of Mammographic Sensitivity.

Authors:  Alan Hollingsworth; Abraham N Morse
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.