Literature DB >> 15687421

Efficacy of breastfeeding support provided by trained clinicians during an early, routine, preventive visit: a prospective, randomized, open trial of 226 mother-infant pairs.

Jose Labarere1, Nathalie Gelbert-Baudino, Anne-Sophie Ayral, Cathy Duc, Martine Berchotteau, Nathalie Bouchon, Camille Schelstraete, Jean-Philippe Vittoz, Patrice Francois, Jean-Claude Pons.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite growing evidence of the benefits of prolonged breastfeeding for mother and infant health, the rate of breastfeeding at infant age of 6 months remains below the Healthy People 2010 goal. The greatest decrease in the breastfeeding rate occurs during the first 4 postpartum weeks. Mothers who discontinue breastfeeding early are more likely to report lack of confidence in their ability to breastfeed, problems with the infant latching or suckling, and lack of individualized encouragement from their clinicians in the early postdischarge period. Observational studies suggest that primary care physicians can increase breastfeeding rates through specific advice and practices during routine preventive visits. However, robust scientific evidence based on randomized, controlled trials is currently lacking.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether attending an early, routine, preventive, outpatient visit delivered in a primary care physician's office would improve breastfeeding outcomes.
DESIGN: The study was a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open trial.
SETTING: Participants were recruited at a level 3 maternity facility, with an average of 2000 births per year, in France. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 231 mothers who had delivered a healthy singleton infant (gestational age: > or =37 completed weeks) and were breastfeeding on the day of discharge were recruited and randomized (116 were assigned to the intervention group and 115 to the control group) between October 1, 2001, and May 31, 2002; 226 mother-infant pairs (112 in the intervention group and 114 in the control group) contributed data on outcomes. INTERVENTION: Support for breastfeeding in the control group included the usual verbal encouragement provided by the maternity ward staff members, a general health assessment and an evaluation for evidence of successful breastfeeding behavior by the pediatrician working in the obstetrics department on the day of discharge, provision of the telephone number of a peer support group, mandatory routine, preventive, outpatient visits at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months of infant age, and 10 weeks of paid maternity leave (extended to 18 weeks after the birth of the third child). In addition to the usual predischarge and postdischarge support, the mothers in the intervention group were invited to attend an individual, routine, preventive, outpatient visit in the office of 1 of the 17 participating primary care physicians (pediatricians or family physicians) within 2 weeks after the birth. The participating physicians received a 5-hour training program on breastfeeding, delivered in 2 parts in 1 month, before the beginning of the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding reported at 4 weeks (defined as giving maternal milk as the only food source, with no other foods or liquids, other than vitamins or medications, being given). The secondary outcomes included any breastfeeding reported at 4 weeks, breastfeeding duration, breastfeeding difficulties, and satisfaction with breastfeeding experiences. Classification into breastfeeding categories reported at 4 weeks was based on 24-hour dietary recall.
RESULTS: Ninety-two mothers (79.3%) assigned to the intervention group and 8 mothers (7.0%) assigned to the control group reported that they had attended the routine, preventive, outpatient visit in the office of 1 of the 17 primary care physicians participating in the study. Mothers in the intervention group were more likely to report exclusive breastfeeding at 4 weeks (83.9% vs 71.9%; hazard ratio: 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.34) and longer breastfeeding duration (median: 18 weeks vs 13 weeks; hazard ratio: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.03-1.92). They were less likely to report any breastfeeding difficulties (55.3% vs 72.8%; hazard ratio: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.62-0.93). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to the rate of any breastfeeding at 4 weeks (89.3% vs 81.6%; hazard ratio: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.98-1.22) and the rate of mothers fairly or very satisfied with their breastfeeding experiences (91.1% vs 87.7%; hazard ratio: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.95-1.14).
CONCLUSIONS: Although we cannot exclude the possibility that findings might differ in other health care systems, this study provides preliminary evidence of the efficacy of breastfeeding support through an early, routine, preventive visit in the offices of trained primary care physicians. Our findings also suggest that a short training program for practicing physicians might contribute to improving breastfeeding outcomes. Multifaceted interventions aiming to support breastfeeding should involve primary care physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15687421     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-1362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  41 in total

1.  Maternal experience of interactions with providers among mothers with milk supply concern.

Authors:  Valerie J Flaherman; Katherine G Hicks; Michael D Cabana; Kathryn A Lee
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 1.168

Review 2.  Guidelines and Interventions Related to the Postpartum Visit for Low-Risk Postpartum Women in High and Upper Middle Income Countries.

Authors:  Katrina Stumbras; Kristin Rankin; Rachel Caskey; Sadia Haider; Arden Handler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

Review 3.  Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.

Authors:  Mary J Renfrew; Felicia M McCormick; Angela Wade; Beverley Quinn; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16

4.  The development and delivery of a practice-based breastfeeding education package for general practitioners in the UK.

Authors:  Sue Burt; Mary Whitmore; Deana Vearncombe; Fiona Dykes
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  CD-ROM-based program for breastfeeding mothers.

Authors:  José Labarère; Nathalie Gelbert-Baudino; Laurent Laborde; Domitille Arragain; Camille Schelstraete; Patrice François
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Randomised trial comparing hand expression with breast pumping for mothers of term newborns feeding poorly.

Authors:  Valerie J Flaherman; Barbara Gay; Cheryl Scott; Andrew Avins; Kathryn A Lee; Thomas B Newman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  ABM Clinical Protocol #5: Peripartum breastfeeding management for the healthy mother and infant at term, revision 2013.

Authors:  Allison V Holmes; Angela Yerdon McLeod; Maya Bunik
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  The impact of community health professional contact postpartum on breastfeeding at 3 months: a cross-sectional retrospective study.

Authors:  Wendy E Brodribb; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-09

9.  Reasons for earlier than desired cessation of breastfeeding.

Authors:  Erika C Odom; Ruowei Li; Kelley S Scanlon; Cria G Perrine; Laurence Grummer-Strawn
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Why do women stop breast-feeding? Results from a contemporary prospective study in a cohort of Australian women.

Authors:  R M Newby; P S W Davies
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.