Literature DB >> 15687090

Reimplementation of the Biome-BGC model to simulate successional change.

Ben Bond-Lamberty1, Stith T Gower, Douglas E Ahl, Peter E Thornton.   

Abstract

Biogeochemical process models are increasingly employed to simulate current and future forest dynamics, but most simulate only a single canopy type. This limitation means that mixed stands, canopy succession and understory dynamics cannot be modeled, severe handicaps in many forests. The goals of this study were to develop a version of Biome-BGC that supported multiple, interacting vegetation types, and to assess its performance and limitations by comparing modeled results to published data from a 150-year boreal black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP) chronosequence in northern Manitoba, Canada. Model data structures and logic were modified to support an arbitrary number of interacting vegetation types; an explicit height calculation was necessary to prioritize radiation and precipitation interception. Two vegetation types, evergreen needle-leaf and deciduous broadleaf, were modeled based on site-specific meteorological and physiological data. The new version of Biome-BGC reliably simulated observed changes in leaf area, net primary production and carbon stocks, and should be useful for modeling the dynamics of mixed-species stands and ecological succession. We discuss the strengths and limitations of Biome-BGC for this application, and note areas in which further work is necessary for reliable simulation of boreal biogeochemical cycling at a landscape scale.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15687090     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/25.4.413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  3 in total

1.  Leaf-traits and growth allometry explain competition and differences in response to climatic change in a temperate forest landscape: a simulation study.

Authors:  Mei Yu; Qiong Gao
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Estimating the carbon budget and maximizing future carbon uptake for a temperate forest region in the U.S.

Authors:  Scott D Peckham; Stith T Gower; Joseph Buongiorno
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2012-06-19

3.  The sensitivity of the forest carbon budget shifts across processes along with stand development and climate change.

Authors:  Alessio Collalti; Peter E Thornton; Alessandro Cescatti; Angelo Rita; Marco Borghetti; Angelo Nolè; Carlo Trotta; Philippe Ciais; Giorgio Matteucci
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.657

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.