Literature DB >> 15686818

Potential access and revealed access to pain management medications.

Swu-Jane Lin1, Stephanie Y Crawford, J Warren Salmon.   

Abstract

The area configuration of healthcare resources, such as the number of hospitals per hundred thousand population, has often been used in healthcare planning and policy making to estimate the global access (potential access) of health services to a local population. However, the actual utilization of the "available" healthcare resources (revealed access) is usually much more limited. The objectives of this study were to examine the availability of healthcare resources by measuring the potential access and the revealed access for outpatients who need to access pharmacies to fill prescriptions of Schedule II (CII) opioids for pain management, and to explore the difference between rural and urban residents in these two types of access. About 191,700 prescriptions for CII opioids dispensed in 1997 in the state of Michigan, USA were analyzed. Revealed accessibility was measured by the distance between the paired zip codes of the pharmacy and the patient listed on each prescription. Potential accessibility was measured by the distance from a patient's zip code to that of the nearest community pharmacy that could dispense the opioid prescriptions. The analyses on revealed access showed that 50% of the CII prescriptions were dispensed by pharmacies located within a 5-mile radius of patients' residences, 75% of prescriptions were dispensed within about a 10-mile radius, and 90% were within 20 miles. If patients were free to access the nearest pharmacy for dispensing (a hypothetical situation under potential access), the median, 75th percentile, and 90th percentile distances could reduce to 2, 3, and 5 miles, respectively. Similar differences between revealed and potential access were observed in both rural and urban areas and for every major opioid drug group. We conclude that policymakers should recognize the discrepancy between potential and revealed accessibility and move beyond only considering area configuration of healthcare resources to evaluating and improving access to care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15686818     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  4 in total

1.  The effects of rurality on mental and physical health.

Authors:  Steven Stern; Elizabeth Merwin; Emily Hauenstein; Ivora Hinton; Virginia Rovnyak; Melvin Wilson; Ishan Williams; Irma Mahone
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2010-08-06

2.  Does distance matter? Geographical variation in GP out-of-hours service use: an observational study.

Authors:  Joanne Turnbull; David Martin; Val Lattimer; Catherine Pope; David Culliford
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  An adapted two-step floating catchment area method accounting for urban-rural differences in spatial access to pharmacies.

Authors:  Yuhong Zhou; Kirsten M M Beyer; Purushottam W Laud; Aaron N Winn; Liliana E Pezzin; Ann B Nattinger; Joan Neuner
Journal:  J Pharm Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-16

4.  Modeling patients' time, travel, and monitoring costs in anticoagulation management: societal savings achievable with the shift from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Aapeli Leminen; Mikko Pyykönen; Juho Tynkkynen; Markku Tykkyläinen; Tiina Laatikainen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.