Literature DB >> 15686815

Perspectives on use and protection of genetic information in work settings: results of a preliminary study.

Laura Weiss Roberts1, Cynthia M A Geppert, Teddy D Warner, Katherine A Green Hammond, Melinda Rogers, Julienne Smrcka, Brian B Roberts.   

Abstract

The societal use of genetic information raises ethical concerns, and the views of working persons regarding genetic information have received little attention. We performed an empirical project to characterize perspectives of 63 employees at two sites who expressed strong interest in learning about and protecting their personal genetic information. Genetic data were seen as more sensitive than other health data, and disclosure of genetic susceptibility was perceived as having negative consequences. This study suggests the value of exploring the perspectives of key stakeholders most directly affected by genetic applications across diverse societal settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15686815     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  5 in total

Review 1.  Genetic testing in psychiatry: a review of attitudes and beliefs.

Authors:  Ryan E Lawrence; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.458

Review 2.  Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Philip J Candilis; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Perspectives on medical research involving men in schizophrenia and HIV-related protocols.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Teddy D Warner; Katherine A Green Hammond; Cynthia M A Geppert
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Ethical issues of genetic susceptibility testing for occupational diseases: opinions of trainees in a high-risk job.

Authors:  M J Visser; M D F Rhebergen; S Kezic; F J H van Dijk; D L Willems; M M Verberk
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 5.  Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora's box?

Authors:  Kunal Sanghavi; Betty Cohn; Anya E R Prince; W Gregory Feero; Kerry A Ryan; Kayte Spector-Bagdady; Wendy R Uhlmann; Charles Lee; J Scott Roberts; Debra J H Mathews
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 8.617

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.