BACKGROUND: Originally introduced for cutaneous T-cell lymphomas and autoimmune diseases, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been proven effective to reverse allograft rejection. The aim of the present work was to show the results of a single-center experience with ECP for the treatment of biopsy-proven rejection in selected liver transplant (LT) recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of five LT patients (M:F=4:1; median age 51 years) undergoing ECP for biopsy-proven allograft rejection between January 1996 and December 2003. In this period 476 LT were performed on 441 patients. RESULTS: The indications for LT were three cases of HCV-related cirrhosis, complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma in two; one HBV-HDV-alcoholic cirrhosis; and one fulminant HBV hepatitis. All patients received calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression with induction using anti-IL2R monoclonal antibodies. Indications for ECP were: ductopenic rejection in one patient with HCV recurrence; steroid-resistant acute rejection in two; acute rejection in a major ABO-mismatched liver graft; and one acute rejection in a patient with a proven allergy to steroids. The median interval from LT to inception of ECP was 43 days. The median number of ECP sessions per patient was 20. During the course of ECP, two patients tested positive for CMV antigenemia, associated in one case with bacterial pneumonia. All patients tolerated ECP and there were no procedure-related complications. At a median follow-up of 7.9 months after start of ECP, neither rejection relapses nor HCV/HBV recurrences have been observed. Three patients are off ECP with complete reversal and low-dose immunosuppression. Two patients are still receiving ECP with full-dose immunosuppression: one has achieved normal liver function but ECP is indicated due to a major ABO-incompatible liver graft, while the other patient's liver functions have not yet returned to baseline values.
BACKGROUND: Originally introduced for cutaneous T-cell lymphomas and autoimmune diseases, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been proven effective to reverse allograft rejection. The aim of the present work was to show the results of a single-center experience with ECP for the treatment of biopsy-proven rejection in selected liver transplant (LT) recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of five LT patients (M:F=4:1; median age 51 years) undergoing ECP for biopsy-proven allograft rejection between January 1996 and December 2003. In this period 476 LT were performed on 441 patients. RESULTS: The indications for LT were three cases of HCV-related cirrhosis, complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma in two; one HBV-HDV-alcoholic cirrhosis; and one fulminant HBV hepatitis. All patients received calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression with induction using anti-IL2R monoclonal antibodies. Indications for ECP were: ductopenic rejection in one patient with HCV recurrence; steroid-resistant acute rejection in two; acute rejection in a major ABO-mismatched liver graft; and one acute rejection in a patient with a proven allergy to steroids. The median interval from LT to inception of ECP was 43 days. The median number of ECP sessions per patient was 20. During the course of ECP, two patients tested positive for CMV antigenemia, associated in one case with bacterial pneumonia. All patients tolerated ECP and there were no procedure-related complications. At a median follow-up of 7.9 months after start of ECP, neither rejection relapses nor HCV/HBV recurrences have been observed. Three patients are off ECP with complete reversal and low-dose immunosuppression. Two patients are still receiving ECP with full-dose immunosuppression: one has achieved normal liver function but ECP is indicated due to a major ABO-incompatible liver graft, while the other patient's liver functions have not yet returned to baseline values.
Authors: R Knobler; G Berlin; P Calzavara-Pinton; H Greinix; P Jaksch; L Laroche; J Ludvigsson; P Quaglino; W Reinisch; J Scarisbrick; T Schwarz; P Wolf; P Arenberger; C Assaf; M Bagot; M Barr; A Bohbot; L Bruckner-Tuderman; B Dreno; A Enk; L French; R Gniadecki; H Gollnick; M Hertl; C Jantschitsch; A Jung; U Just; C-D Klemke; U Lippert; T Luger; E Papadavid; H Pehamberger; A Ranki; R Stadler; W Sterry; I H Wolf; M Worm; J Zic; C C Zouboulis; U Hillen Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: A Legitimo; R Consolini; A Failli; S Fabiano; W Bencivelli; F Scatena; F Mosca Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2007-03-26 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Arun Alfred; Peter C Taylor; Fiona Dignan; Khaled El-Ghariani; James Griffin; Andrew R Gennery; Denise Bonney; Emma Das-Gupta; Sarah Lawson; Ram K Malladi; Kenneth W Douglas; Tracey Maher; Julie Guest; Laura Hartlett; Andrew J Fisher; Fiona Child; Julia J Scarisbrick Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Timothy J Brown; Cathy Gentry; Suntrea T G Hammer; Christine S Hwang; Madhuri Vusirikala; Prapti A Patel; Karén Matevosyan; Shannan R Tujios; Arjmand R Mufti; Robert H Collins Journal: ACG Case Rep J Date: 2017-03-29
Authors: R Knobler; P Arenberger; A Arun; C Assaf; M Bagot; G Berlin; A Bohbot; P Calzavara-Pinton; F Child; A Cho; L E French; A R Gennery; R Gniadecki; H P M Gollnick; E Guenova; P Jaksch; C Jantschitsch; C Klemke; J Ludvigsson; E Papadavid; J Scarisbrick; T Schwarz; R Stadler; P Wolf; J Zic; C Zouboulis; A Zuckermann; H Greinix Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 9.228