Judith G Bartlett1. 1. Centre for Aboriginal Health Research, Department of Community Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Room 715, John Buhler Research Centre, 715 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P4. bartlet0@ms.umanitoba.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Continuing compromised Aboriginal health status and increasing opportunity for new Aboriginal health surveys require that Aboriginal understandings of health and well-being be documented. This research begins exploration of whether the Aboriginal Life Promotion Framework may increase culturally pertinent planning, collection and analysis of health survey data. METHODS: A quasi-phenomenological tradition of enquiry was employed to gain understanding of the lived experience of participants. Data were collected through focus groups utilizing a 'talking circle' methodology. A participatory research approach involved three large Aboriginal organizations. RESULTS: Conceptions of health and of well-being are different entities for these Métis women. Health was most often more reflective of physical issues. Well-being was much broader, holistic and inclusive of the dimensions of spiritual, emotional, physical and mental/intellectual aspects of living, consistent with the first circle of the Aboriginal Life Promotion Framework. CONCLUSIONS: The implications of this study should be important to health providers, and policy developers regardless of sector. Métis women in this study show significant strengths in the spiritual, emotional and intellectual/mental aspects of life, areas that could be incorporated into health promotion approaches. Physical health was focussed on ensuring a healthy diet and exercise, yet most adult women in the study experienced stress around goals that are seen as relatively unattainable. The data produced in this study should be utilized to develop and test survey questions that can be applied to a larger portion of the Métis population. The Aboriginal Life Promotion Framework is useful as an organizing tool for systematically exploring elements of living.
BACKGROUND: Continuing compromised Aboriginal health status and increasing opportunity for new Aboriginal health surveys require that Aboriginal understandings of health and well-being be documented. This research begins exploration of whether the Aboriginal Life Promotion Framework may increase culturally pertinent planning, collection and analysis of health survey data. METHODS: A quasi-phenomenological tradition of enquiry was employed to gain understanding of the lived experience of participants. Data were collected through focus groups utilizing a 'talking circle' methodology. A participatory research approach involved three large Aboriginal organizations. RESULTS: Conceptions of health and of well-being are different entities for these Métis women. Health was most often more reflective of physical issues. Well-being was much broader, holistic and inclusive of the dimensions of spiritual, emotional, physical and mental/intellectual aspects of living, consistent with the first circle of the Aboriginal Life Promotion Framework. CONCLUSIONS: The implications of this study should be important to health providers, and policy developers regardless of sector. Métis women in this study show significant strengths in the spiritual, emotional and intellectual/mental aspects of life, areas that could be incorporated into health promotion approaches. Physical health was focussed on ensuring a healthy diet and exercise, yet most adult women in the study experienced stress around goals that are seen as relatively unattainable. The data produced in this study should be utilized to develop and test survey questions that can be applied to a larger portion of the Métis population. The Aboriginal Life Promotion Framework is useful as an organizing tool for systematically exploring elements of living.
Authors: Lynn Jansen; Geoffrey Maina; Beth Horsburgh; Maha Kumaran; Kasha Mcharo; George Laliberte; Joanne Kappel; Carol Ann Bullin Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2020-05-04
Authors: Alana Gall; Kate Anderson; Kirsten Howard; Abbey Diaz; Alexandra King; Esther Willing; Michele Connolly; Daniel Lindsay; Gail Garvey Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 3.390