BACKGROUND: Cost-containment measures have led to a constant increase in the number of patients cared for as outpatients. Several studies have demonstrated that surgical site infections result in considerable morbidity and excess health care costs from extended duration of hospitalization and antibiotic use. OBJECTIVE: AMBU-KISS is a protocol designed to create a reference database on surgical site infections for institutions involved in ambulatory surgery. METHODS: This study was carried out using a physician questionnaire. We compared surgical site infection rates for 3 indicator procedures in the ambulatory setting to those observed in the inpatient setting. The 3 indicator procedures chosen for the protocol were arthroscopic knee surgery and inguinal hernia and vein-stripping procedures. RESULTS: The arithmetic mean values of surgical site infection rates in arthroscopic surgery of the knee are 0.09% in the ambulatory setting and 0.11% in the hospital setting. For inguinal hernias, the respective rates are 0.65% and 0.78%. These differences, however, did not reach statistical significance (arthroscopic surgery, P = .8323 and inguinal herniotomies, P = .4895). A marked difference was observed for vein-stripping procedures, with surgical site infection rates of 0.38% in the ambulatory setting and 0.64% in the hospital setting. However, this difference was also not statistically significant, P = .1556. CONCLUSION: The AMBU-KISS protocol appears to be suitable for assessing and defining the magnitude of surgical site infections in ambulatory surgery. The preliminary results of our study show no significant differences for the 3 indicator procedures.
BACKGROUND: Cost-containment measures have led to a constant increase in the number of patients cared for as outpatients. Several studies have demonstrated that surgical site infections result in considerable morbidity and excess health care costs from extended duration of hospitalization and antibiotic use. OBJECTIVE: AMBU-KISS is a protocol designed to create a reference database on surgical site infections for institutions involved in ambulatory surgery. METHODS: This study was carried out using a physician questionnaire. We compared surgical site infection rates for 3 indicator procedures in the ambulatory setting to those observed in the inpatient setting. The 3 indicator procedures chosen for the protocol were arthroscopic knee surgery and inguinal hernia and vein-stripping procedures. RESULTS: The arithmetic mean values of surgical site infection rates in arthroscopic surgery of the knee are 0.09% in the ambulatory setting and 0.11% in the hospital setting. For inguinal hernias, the respective rates are 0.65% and 0.78%. These differences, however, did not reach statistical significance (arthroscopic surgery, P = .8323 and inguinal herniotomies, P = .4895). A marked difference was observed for vein-stripping procedures, with surgical site infection rates of 0.38% in the ambulatory setting and 0.64% in the hospital setting. However, this difference was also not statistically significant, P = .1556. CONCLUSION: The AMBU-KISS protocol appears to be suitable for assessing and defining the magnitude of surgical site infections in ambulatory surgery. The preliminary results of our study show no significant differences for the 3 indicator procedures.
Authors: Deverick J Anderson; Kelly Podgorny; Sandra I Berríos-Torres; Dale W Bratzler; E Patchen Dellinger; Linda Greene; Ann-Christine Nyquist; Lisa Saiman; Deborah S Yokoe; Lisa L Maragakis; Keith S Kaye Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: D Weyhe; C Winnemöller; A Hellwig; K Meurer; H Plugge; K Kasoly; H Laubenthal; K-H Bauer; W Uhl Journal: Chirurg Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 0.955