Literature DB >> 15685128

Risk factors for surgical site infections in a free-standing outpatient setting.

Stefan Hirsemann1, Dorit Sohr, Knud Gastmeier, Petra Gastmeier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More information about risk factors for surgical site infections in outpatient settings is necessary for creation of surveillance systems in this field.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) in an outpatient setting and to investigate whether the risk index of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System is appropriate for outpatient settings.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort design was used to investigate SSI following all hernia repairs and varicose veins operations over a 9-year period in a freestanding outpatient setting. The exposure variables studied were age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of the patient; duration of operation; performing surgeon's name; type of operation; type of anesthesia; and follow-up period. An univariable and a multivariable analysis were performed to determine risk factors for SSI.
RESULTS: A total of 1095 operations were performed: 714 on varicose veins and 381 on hernia repairs. The median follow-up period was 43 days. The crude SSI rate was 1.2% (varicose veins operations, 1.5%; hernia repair operations, 0.5%). According to the results of the logistic regression model, only 1 factor remained significant: Patients with spinal anesthesia were 11 times as likely to develop a SSI as patients with any other type of anesthesia (95% CI, 2.15-200.5).
CONCLUSION: The NNIS risk index was not suitable for assessing SSI rates in this outpatient setting and for these specific procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15685128     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  3 in total

Review 1.  Superficial venous insufficiency from the infernal to the endothermal.

Authors:  D Carradice
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Transparent Film Dressings and Conventional Occlusive Dressings for Elective Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Moushira Hosny Ezzelarab; Omar Nouh; Ahmed Nabil Ahmed; Mervat Gaber Anany; Nevine Gamal El Rachidi; Ahmed Safwat Salem
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-08-29

3.  Assessing the effectiveness of dialkylcarbamoylchloride (DACC)-coated post-operative dressings versus standard care in the prevention of surgical site infection in clean or clean-contaminated, vascular surgery (the DRESSINg trial): study protocol for a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Joshua P Totty; Amy E Harwood; Paris L Cai; Louise H Hitchman; George E Smith; Ian C Chetter
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2019-01-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.