Literature DB >> 15684853

Recruiting for research in hospice: feasibility of a research screening protocol.

David Casarett1, Cordt T Kassner, Jean S Kutner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The growth of palliative care research has been limited by challenges of slow recruitment and underenrollment. One potential solution to this problem is the use of screening questions embedded in clinical data collection, which identify patients who are interested in participating in research and who can then be approached directly. The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of this strategy for identifying hospice patients who are interested in research participation.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING/
SUBJECTS: Patients and their families who had enrolled in one of two community-based hospice programs. MEASUREMENTS: Three screening questions (for survey-based research, clinical trials and family- focused research) were integrated into the intake process of two community-based hospice organizations.
RESULTS: Of the 214 patients who were able to respond, 54% indicated willingness to be approached about survey-based research, 40% were willing to be approached for clinical trials and 65% were willing to be approached for family-focused research.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that screening questions may be useful in identifying hospice patients who are willing to be recruited for research. Further study is needed to define the likelihood that these patients will consent and whether these screening questions introduce selection bias in the recruitment process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15684853     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2004.7.854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  5 in total

1.  Methodological challenges in conducting a multi-site randomized clinical trial of massage therapy in hospice.

Authors:  Jean Kutner; Marlaine Smith; Karen Mellis; Sue Felton; Traci Yamashita; Lisa Corbin
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Ethical conduct of palliative care research: enhancing communication between investigators and institutional review boards.

Authors:  Amy P Abernethy; Warren H Capell; Noreen M Aziz; Christine Ritchie; Maryjo Prince-Paul; Rachael E Bennett; Jean S Kutner
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  A screening tool for predicting gatekeeping behaviour.

Authors:  Austyn Snowden; Jenny Young
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2017-05-07

4.  Stakeholder-engaged process for refining the design of a clinical trial in home hospice.

Authors:  Jennifer Tjia; Margaret Clayton; Germán Chiriboga; Brooke Staples; Geraldine Puerto; Lynley Rappaport; Susan DeSanto-Madeya
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Factors affecting recruitment to an observational multicentre palliative care study.

Authors:  Patrick C Stone; Bridget Gwilliam; Vaughan Keeley; Chris Todd; Laura C Kelly; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.568

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.