Literature DB >> 15684785

Basic ultrasound curriculum for medical students: validation of content and phantom.

Min C Yoo1, Leonardo Villegas, Daniel B Jones.   

Abstract

Effective use of ultrasound requires an understanding of the physics, combined with the ability to interpret the sonographic images. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of a basic ultrasound curriculum using a phantom to train medical students. Twenty-eight first- to fourth-year medical students were randomized to two groups: a control group that received no formal training and a trained group that received basic ultrasound training. Both groups took an initial multiple-choice written test and an ultrasound hands-on test using an agarose-based tissue mimic containing various objects. The curriculum for the trained group consisted of reading the principles of ultrasound and a hands-on session over the phantom. After training, both groups underwent a second multiple-choice exam and ultrasound practical test. The initial and the post-training test results were analyzed using a two-tailed Student's t-test. Baseline written and practical test scores were similar for both groups. After training, written test scores improved (82% trained vs. 66% control, P < 0.001). Hands-on ultrasound task performance also improved with training (96% trained vs. 60% control, P <0.001). The trained group took a shorter time to obtain a clear image and found on average one more object per scan. Parameters such as time to obtain a useful image and number of objects recognized also improved with training. Basic sonographic physics, imaging, and interpretation can be effectively taught to medical students during a short training session.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15684785     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2004.14.374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  11 in total

1.  An integrated ultrasound curriculum (iUSC) for medical students: 4-year experience.

Authors:  Richard A Hoppmann; Victor V Rao; Mary Beth Poston; Duncan B Howe; Patrick S Hunt; Stanley D Fowler; Lance E Paulman; James R Wells; Nancy A Richeson; Paul V Catalana; Lynn K Thomas; L Britt Wilson; Thomas Cook; Shaun Riffle; Francis H Neuffer; James B McCallum; Brian D Keisler; Rachel S Brown; Anthony R Gregg; Kerry M Sims; Caroline K Powell; Matthew D Garber; James E Morrison; William B Owens; Kevin A Carnevale; William R Jennings; Sarah Fletcher
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2011-02-01

2.  Adding new tools to the black bag--introduction of ultrasound into the physical diagnosis course.

Authors:  Nelia Afonso; David Amponsah; James Yang; Jennifer Mendez; Patrick Bridge; Gregory Hays; Sudhir Baliga; Karen Crist; Simone Brennan; Matt Jackson; Scott Dulchavsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Assessment Methods in Medical Ultrasound Education.

Authors:  Elena Höhne; Florian Recker; Christoph Frank Dietrich; Valentin Sebastian Schäfer
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  The sonographic digital portfolio: a longitudinal ultrasound image tracking program.

Authors:  Daralee R Hughes; Erika Kube; Brad D Gable; Francis E Madore; David P Bahner
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2012-07-02

5.  Bedside ultrasound education in Canadian medical schools: A national survey.

Authors:  Peter Steinmetz; Octavian Dobrescu; Sharon Oleskevich; John Lewis
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2016-03-31

6.  Pilot Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum at Harvard Medical School: Early Experience.

Authors:  Joshua S Rempell; Fidencio Saldana; Donald DiSalvo; Navin Kumar; Michael B Stone; Wilma Chan; Jennifer Luz; Vicki E Noble; Andrew Liteplo; Heidi Kimberly; Minna J Kohler
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-09-12

7.  Use of gelatin puzzle phantoms to teach medical students isolated ultrasound transducer movements and fundamental concepts.

Authors:  Lauren M Maloney; Peggy A Seidman; Kristen M Zach; Neera K Tewari; Matthew F Tito; Christopher R Page
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Teaching ultrasound in a curricular course according to certified EFSUMB standards during undergraduate medical education: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hauke S Heinzow; Hendrik Friederichs; Philipp Lenz; Andre Schmedt; Jan C Becker; Karin Hengst; Bernhard Marschall; Dirk Domagk
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Integrated medical school ultrasound: development of an ultrasound vertical curriculum.

Authors:  David P Bahner; Eric J Adkins; Daralee Hughes; Michael Barrie; Creagh T Boulger; Nelson A Royall
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2013-07-02

10.  First-year medical students use of ultrasound or physical examination to diagnose hepatomegaly and ascites: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Samantha Arora; Angela C Cheung; Usman Tarique; Arnav Agarwal; Mohammed Firdouse; Jonathan Ailon
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2017-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.