Literature DB >> 15684770

Uncontrollable stimulation undermines recovery after spinal cord injury.

James W Grau1, Stephanie N Washburn, Michelle A Hook, Adam R Ferguson, Eric D Crown, Guadalupe Garcia, Kevin A Bolding, Rajesh C Miranda.   

Abstract

Prior studies have shown that neurons within the spinal cord are sensitive to response-outcome relations, a form of instrumental learning. Spinally transected rats that receive shock to one hind leg learn to maintain the leg in a flexed position that minimizes net shock exposure (controllable shock). Prior exposure to uncontrollable stimulation (intermittent shock) inhibits this spinally mediated learning. Here it is shown that uncontrollable stimulation undermines the recovery of function after a spinal contusion injury. Rats received a moderate injury (12.5 mm drop) and recovery was monitored for 6 weeks. In Experiment 1, rats received varying amounts of intermittent tailshock 1-2 days after injury. Just 6 min of intermittent shock impaired locomotor recovery. In Experiment 2, rats were shocked 1, 4, or 14 days after injury. Delaying the application of shock exposure reduced its negative effect on recovery. In Experiment 3, rats received controllable or uncontrollable shock 24 and 48 h after injury. Only uncontrollable shock disrupted recovery of locomotor function. Uncontrollably shocked rats also exhibited higher vocalization thresholds to aversive stimuli (heat and shock) applied below the injury. Across the three experiments, exposure to uncontrollable shock, (1) delayed the recovery of bladder function; (2) led to greater mortality and spasticity; and (3) increased tissue loss (white and gray matter) in the region of the injury. The results indicate that uncontrollable stimulation impairs recovery after spinal cord injury and suggest that reducing sources of uncontrolled afferent input (e.g., from peripheral tissue injury) could benefit patient recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15684770     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  61 in total

1.  MicroRNA dysregulation following spinal cord contusion: implications for neural plasticity and repair.

Authors:  E R Strickland; M A Hook; S Balaraman; J R Huie; J W Grau; R C Miranda
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 2.  Learning to promote recovery after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  James W Grau; Rachel E Baine; Paris A Bean; Jacob A Davis; Gizelle N Fauss; Melissa K Henwood; Kelsey E Hudson; David T Johnston; Megan M Tarbet; Misty M Strain
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 3.  Spinal neurons exhibit a surprising capacity to learn and a hidden vulnerability when freed from the brain's control.

Authors:  James W Grau; Michelle A Hook
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  An IL-1 receptor antagonist blocks a morphine-induced attenuation of locomotor recovery after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Michelle A Hook; Stephanie N Washburn; Georgina Moreno; Sarah A Woller; Denise Puga; Kuan H Lee; James W Grau
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 7.217

5.  Assessment of depression in a rodent model of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Kelsey Luedtke; Sioui Maldonado Bouchard; Sarah A Woller; Mary Katherine Funk; Miriam Aceves; Michelle A Hook
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 6.  What Is Being Trained? How Divergent Forms of Plasticity Compete To Shape Locomotor Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  J Russell Huie; Kazuhito Morioka; Jenny Haefeli; Adam R Ferguson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  BDNF and learning: Evidence that instrumental training promotes learning within the spinal cord by up-regulating BDNF expression.

Authors:  F Gómez-Pinilla; J R Huie; Z Ying; A R Ferguson; E D Crown; K M Baumbauer; V R Edgerton; J W Grau
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Opioid regulation of spinal cord plasticity: evidence the kappa-2 opioid receptor agonist GR89696 inhibits learning within the rat spinal cord.

Authors:  Stephanie N Washburn; Marissa L Maultsby; Denise A Puga; James W Grau
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Timing in the absence of supraspinal input I: variable, but not fixed, spaced stimulation of the sciatic nerve undermines spinally-mediated instrumental learning.

Authors:  K M Baumbauer; K C Hoy; J R Huie; A J Hughes; S A Woller; D A Puga; B Setlow; J W Grau
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Simvastatin protects bladder and renal functions following spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Anandakumar Shunmugavel; Mushfiquddin Khan; Peter C Te Chou; Ramanpreet K Dhindsa; Marcus M Martin; Anne G Copay; Brian R Subach; Thomas C Schuler; Mehmet Bilgen; John K Orak; Inderjit Singh
Journal:  J Inflamm (Lond)       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.