Literature DB >> 15683888

Comparison of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro.

Lorenz Flückiger1, Tuomas Waltimo, Hermann Stich, Adrian Lussi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv) to conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth.
METHODS: Twenty-two freshly extracted teeth with varying degree of caries were treated using both of these methods. One part of each caries lesion was prepared using the Carisolv method and the other part using conventional hand excavation. The third (middle) part was left untreated to serve as control. Histological preparations of each tooth were then made and examined in order to compare the quality of the preparations. Length and area of residual caries, microhardness of the dentine in each group and time needed for preparation were analysed.
RESULTS: The results showed that there was no significant difference in the amount of residual caries in the cavity walls treated using the two methods.
CONCLUSIONS: The Carisolv method was significantly more time consuming than conventional preparation using hand excavator. However, both methods removed caries efficiently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15683888     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the efficacy of chemicomechanical caries removal with conventional methods - a clinical study.

Authors:  Pallvi Goomer; R L Jain; Harsimrat Kaur; Rahul Sood
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-06-23

2.  Performance of laser fluorescence for residual caries detection in primary teeth.

Authors:  Taskin Gurbuz; Yucel Yilmaz; Fatih Sengul
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2008-07

3.  Evaluation of Marginal Leakage and Shear Bond Strength of Bonded Restorations in Primary Teeth after Caries Removal by Conventional and Chemomechanical Techniques.

Authors:  Viral Pravin Maru; Bethur Siddaiah Shakuntala; Nagarathna Dharma
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-08-07

4.  Evaluation of Microhardness of Residual Dentin in Primary Molars Following Caries Removal with Conventional and Chemomechanical Techniques: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  A Shihab Anwar; R Krishna Kumar; V Arun Prasad Rao; N Venugopal Reddy; V J Reshma
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2017-11

5.  Two years survival rate of class II composite resin restorations prepared by ART with and without a chemomechanical caries removal gel in primary molars.

Authors:  Asli Topaloglu-Ak; Ece Eden; Jo E Frencken; Ozant Oncag
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Minimal intervention dentistry for managing dental caries - a review: report of a FDI task group.

Authors:  Jo E Frencken; Mathilde C Peters; David J Manton; Soraya C Leal; Valeria V Gordan; Ece Eden
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.607

7.  Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Ankush Ramnarayan Boob; M Manjula; E Rajendra Reddy; N Srilaxmi; Tabitha Rani
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2014-04-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.