| Literature DB >> 15683574 |
Abstract
Electron back scatter diffraction (EBSD) mapping and indexing has rapidly come into widespread use. However, inadequate attention has been paid to the details of the method. Many of the algorithms in current use were chosen because they were the first ones that were found to work, rather than because they were optimum. Results of systematic study are presented. It is shown that more than one method can successfully correct a sampling artifact, that there is an optimum binning ratio, that Gaussian filtering provides an alternative to "butterfly convolution," that better alternatives for mapping image quality than those in current use are available, and that saving all the original patterns is practical and advantageous.Year: 2005 PMID: 15683574 DOI: 10.1017/S1431927605050099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microsc Microanal ISSN: 1431-9276 Impact factor: 4.127