Literature DB >> 15683555

No doubt about offset latency.

Wyeth Bair1.   

Abstract

Neuronal response latency usually refers to the time between the presentation of a visual stimulus and the elevation in firing rate that follows. Expanding on this idea, the concept of response offset latency refers to the time between the removal of a stimulus (or its replacement with one that is less effective) and the resulting decline in firing rate. The initial observation that offset latency is usually shorter than onset latency (Bair et al., 2002) has been called into question on the basis of the pulsatile nature of visual stimuli presented on a CRT (Gawne & Woods, 2003). Here, a counter argument is presented in support of the results of Bair et al., 2002.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15683555     DOI: 10.1017/S0952523804215012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  4 in total

1.  Motion adaptation: net duration matters, not continuousness.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Anja M Schilling; Michael Bach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Multisensory perceptual learning of temporal order: audiovisual learning transfers to vision but not audition.

Authors:  David Alais; John Cass
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Neuronal and perceptual differences in the temporal processing of darks and lights.

Authors:  Stanley Jose Komban; Jens Kremkow; Jianzhong Jin; Yushi Wang; Reza Lashgari; Xiaobing Li; Qasim Zaidi; Jose-Manuel Alonso
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 17.173

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.